Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A G Turpie

Publications and source records attributed to A G Turpie.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Impact of enoxaparin low molecular weight heparin in patients with Q-wave myocardial infarction.

A subgroup meta-analysis from the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) and the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B studies has shown that enoxaparin is superior to unfractionated heparin in reducing the composite end points of death, myocardial infarction, and emergency revascularization in patients with Q-wave myocardial infarction. The beneficial treatment effect was significant at 43 days.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Can we differentiate the low-molecular-weight heparins?

The low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have a number of therapeutic advantages, relative to standard unfractionated heparin (UFH). They are readily bioavailable when injected subcutaneously and can be given in fixed doses, allowing for far simpler administration. Several LMWHs are now commercially available, each demonstrating different physical and chemical properties and different activities in animal models of anticoagulation or hemorrhage. In clinical comparisons with placebo in the treatment of unstable coronary artery disease (UCAD), the LMWHs dalteparin sodium and nadroparin calcium have demonstrated good anticoagulant efficacy. In comparisons with UFH, on the other hand, only enoxaparin has shown superior anticoagulant activity, as reported in the results of the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B trials. However, close scrutiny of the methodology of the clinical trials in UCAD reveals considerable differences in study designs, dosage regimens, duration of administration of active treatments, and the timing and definition of endpoints. Therefore, it would not be scientifically sound to compare results with the different LMWHs based on the current available studies. It is also not possible to draw any conclusions with regard to the relative efficacy of the different LMWHs, since there are no properly-sized comparative data between dalteparin sodium, enoxaparin sodium, and nadroparin calcium.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2000

Randomized trial of low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease: one-year results of the ESSENCE Study. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q Wave Coronary Events.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether the observed benefits of enoxaparin were maintained beyond the early phase; a one-year follow-up survey was undertaken for patients enrolled in the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) study. BACKGROUND: We have previously reported a significant benefit of low molecular weight as compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the 14- and 30-day incidence of a composite end point of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or recurrent angina in patients with unstable angina or non-Qwave MI. METHODS: The study recruited 3,171 patients with recent-onset rest angina and underlying ischemic heart disease. All patients received oral aspirin daily and were randomized to receive enoxaparin subcutaneously every 12 h or UFH (intravenous bolus followed by continuous infusion) in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion for a median of 2.6 days. RESULTS: The incidence of the composite triple end point at one year was lower among patients receiving enoxaparin as compared with those receiving UFH (32.0% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.022), with a trend toward a lower incidence of the secondary composite end point of death or MI (11.5% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.082). At one year, the need for diagnostic catheterization and coronary revascularization was lower in the enoxaparin group (55.8% vs. 59.4%, p = 0.036 and 35.9% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unstable angina or non-Qwave MI, enoxaparin therapy significantly reduced the rates of recurrent ischemic events and invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the short term with sustained benefit at one year.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.

We have previously demonstrated that a clinical model can be safely used in a management strategy in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). We sought to simplify the clinical model and determine a scoring system, that when combined with D-dimer results, would safely exclude PE without the need for other tests, in a large proportion of patients. We used a randomly selected sample of 80% of the patients that participated in a prospective cohort study of patients with suspected PE to perform a logistic regression analysis on 40 clinical variables to create a simple clinical prediction rule. Cut points on the new rule were determined to create two scoring systems. In the first scoring system patients were classified as having low, moderate and high probability of PE with the proportions being similar to those determined in our original study. The second system was designed to create two categories, PE likely and unlikely. The goal in the latter was that PE unlikely patients with a negative D-dimer result would have PE in less than 2% of cases. The proportion of patients with PE in each category was determined overall and according to a positive or negative SimpliRED D-dimer result. After these determinations we applied the models to the remaining 20% of patients as a validation of the results. The following seven variables and assigned scores (in brackets) were included in the clinical prediction rule: Clinical symptoms of DVT (3.0), no alternative diagnosis (3.0), heart rate >100 (1.5), immobilization or surgery in the previous four weeks (1.5), previous DVT/PE (1.5), hemoptysis (1.0) and malignancy (1.0). Patients were considered low probability if the score was <2.0, moderate of the score was 2.0 to 6.0 and high if the score was over 6.0. Pulmonary embolism unlikely was assigned to patients with scores < or =4.0 and PE likely if the score was >4.0. 7.8% of patients with scores of less than or equal to 4 had PE but if the D-dimer was negative in these patients the rate of PE was only 2.2% (95% CI = 1.0% to 4.0%) in the derivation set and 1.7% in the validation set. Importantly this combination occurred in 46% of our study patients. A score of <2.0 and a negative D-dimer results in a PE rate of 1.5% (95% CI = 0.4% to 3.7%) in the derivation set and 2.7% (95% CI = 0.3% to 9.0%) in the validation set and only occurred in 29% of patients. The combination of a score < or =4.0 by our simple clinical prediction rule and a negative SimpliRED D-Dimer result may safely exclude PE in a large proportion of patients with suspected PE.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2000

A computer generated induction system for hospitalized patients starting on oral anticoagulant therapy.

There is an increasing use of computer-based dosage programs to monitor oral anticoagulant therapy in outpatients. DAWN AC INDUCTION by 4S, UK, is a computer generated system to initiate oral anticoagulant therapy providing fast access to the maintenance program. This method of initiation of anticoagulant therapy has not been validated. We therefore randomized 50 hospitalized patients starting oral anticoagulation to control by the computer and 51 by manual dosing using a dosing schedule based on a locally defined algorithm. After a 7 days follow up, the daily mean INR was 2.09 and 2.07 and the proportion of dose adjustments was 48% and 45% in the computer and manually controlled groups respectively. Twenty-eight % of the patients monitored by the computer system required at least one manual overriding. DAWN AC INDUCTION provided a simple and accurate organization of the data, with an overall quality comparable to that of the manual system. Furthermore, the induction programme provided simple access to the maintenance programme. Although it required careful monitoring, the programme resulted in a significant saving in personnel time.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Unfractionated heparin is the traditional treatment of choice for patients presenting with submassive pulmonary embolism. However, newer low-molecular-weight heparins have been developed and tested in several clinical trials in the last 2 decades because of the many limitations of unfractionated heparin. The pharmacologic properties of the low-molecular-weight heparins allow them to be administered subcutaneously in fixed, weight-adjusted doses without need for laboratory monitoring. Different studies have recently proved their efficacy in the treatment of patients with deep vein thrombosis. Because there is good evidence that deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are 2 expressions of a single disease, the use of low-molecular-weight heparins has been extended to patients presenting with clinically stable pulmonary embolism. In particular, the results of 2 important clinical trials, the Columbus and the Thésée, have conclusively proved that the low-molecular-weight heparins are as safe and effective as unfractionated heparin. In some centers, approximately 80% of patients with deep vein thrombosis are treated at home. This suggests that carefully selected patients with clinically stable pulmonary embolism can receive home treatment with low-molecular-weight heparins.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2000

Antithrombotics and anticoagulants in coronary syndromes and stroke.

The low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been proven superior to placebo in reducing the incidence of acute coronary ischemic syndromes. Comparative studies vs. unfractionated heparin have not demonstrated superiority in favor of the LMWH dalteparin. In the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) trial, enoxaparin was demonstrated to have a benefit over heparin. The results have contributed to a better understanding of the relative efficacy of LMWHs in acute coronary syndromes. A second trial with enoxaparin supported the conclusions of the ESSENCE trial. The antithrombotic effects of LMWHs have also been evaluated for the management of ischemic stroke with varied results. A trial assessing tinzaparin in acute ischemic stroke has completed enrollment, and its results may shed new light on the use of an LMWH for the management of stroke.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2000

Therapy of unstable angina with the low molecular weight heparins.

Unstable angina is in most cases caused by partial or complete coronary artery occlusion due to the disruption of an atherosclerotic plaque and to thrombus formation. An immediate antithrombotic approach is essential to prevent fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, and the combination of aspirin and unfractionated heparin has played a pivotal role in the past years. Low molecular weight heparins have improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties over unfractionated heparin that have resulted in greater efficacy and safety in the field of venous thromboembolism. Low molecular weight heparins can be administered by once or twice daily subcutaneous injections at fixed, weight-adjusted doses without the need for monitoring. Because of their potential, many recent clinical trials have evaluated their efficacy and safety in the management of patients with unstable angina. Three low molecular weight heparins have so far been tested: nadroparin, dalteparin and enoxaparin. The results of the published trials confirm that the newer compounds are at least as safe and effective as unfractionated heparin, and offer considerable therapeutic advantages. Nevertheless, the different properties of the three compounds and perhaps the different designs of the clinical trials have led to not entirely comparable findings.

Angina, Unstable↗
PubMed1999

Exaggerated initial response to warfarin following heart valve replacement.

The response to initiation of oral anticoagulants at a usual dose of 5 mg of warfarin has been retrospectively evaluated in patients following heart valve replacement (HVR). Patients starting oral anticoagulants after HVR have a lower target International Normalized Ratio (INR) (1.5 to 2.6) until the pacing wires are removed after operation. The mean daily doses and INR responses after HVR and nonsurgical patients were retrospectively compared during the first 5 days of warfarin treatment. In a subset from both groups, the mean dose of warfarin was correlated with age, body weight, and albumin levels. Eighty-four HVR and 32 nonsurgical patients were studied. The mean daily warfarin dosage was 3.29 +/- 1.29 mg after HVR and 4.96 +/- 1.76 mg in controls (p <0.001), and the mean INRs 2.08 +/- 0.60 and 1.60 +/- 0.54, respectively (p <0.001). Of the HVR patients and controls, 48.8% and 21.8%, respectively, exceeded the upper level of the targeted range (p = 0.014), 86.9% and 40.6% had the dose reduced after the first 5 mg (p <0.001), and 54.7% and 28.1%, respectively, had warfarin withheld for at least 1 day (p = 0.015). Thirty-nine patients were included in the subset analysis. Patients with serum albumin levels <35 g/L required significantly less warfarin (3.84 mg/day) than patients with levels > or =35 g/L (5.37 mg/day; p <0.05). Thus, patients starting oral anticoagulation after HVR are significantly more sensitive to warfarin than nonsurgical patients. Patients with serum albumin levels below the normal values require less warfarin than patients with normal values during the initial phase of treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Enoxaparin prevents death and cardiac ischemic events in unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 11B trial.

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparins are attractive alternatives to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for management of unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (UA/NQMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n=3910) with UA/NQMI were randomized to intravenous UFH for >/=3 days followed by subcutaneous placebo injections or uninterrupted antithrombin therapy with enoxaparin during both the acute phase (initial 30 mg intravenous bolus followed by injections of 1.0 mg/kg every 12 hours) and outpatient phase (injections every 12 hours of 40 mg for patients weighing <65 kg and 60 mg for those weighing >/=65 kg). The primary end point (death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization) occurred by 8 days in 14.5% of patients in the UFH group and 12.4% of patients in the enoxaparin group (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.00; P=0. 048) and by 43 days in 19.7% of the UFH group and 17.3% of the enoxaparin group (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.00; P=0.048). During the first 72 hours and also throughout the entire initial hospitalization, there was no difference in the rate of major hemorrhage in the treatment groups. During the outpatient phase, major hemorrhage occurred in 1.5% of the group treated with placebo and 2.9% of the group treated with enoxaparin (P=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin is superior to UFH for reducing a composite of death and serious cardiac ischemic events during the acute management of UA/NQMI patients without causing a significant increase in the rate of major hemorrhage. No further relative decrease in events occurred with outpatient enoxaparin treatment, but there was an increase in the rate of major hemorrhage.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in patients with acute medical illnesses who may be at risk for venous thromboembolism have not been determined in adequately designed trials. METHODS: In a double-blind study, we randomly assigned 1102 hospitalized patients older than 40 years to receive 40 mg of enoxaparin, 20 mg of enoxaparin, or placebo subcutaneously once daily for 6 to 14 days. Most patients were not in an intensive care unit. The primary outcome was venous thromboembolism between days 1 and 14, defined as deep-vein thrombosis detected by bilateral venography (or duplex ultrasonography) between days 6 and 14 (or earlier if clinically indicated) or documented pulmonary embolism. The duration of follow-up was three months. RESULTS: The primary outcome could be assessed in 866 patients. The incidence of venous thromboembolism was significantly lower in the group that received 40 mg of enoxaparin (5.5 percent [16 of 291 patients]) than in the group that received placebo (14.9 percent [43 of 288 patients]) (relative risk, 0.37; 97.6 percent confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.63; P< 0.001). The benefit observed with 40 mg of enoxaparin was maintained at three months. There was no significant difference in the incidence of venous thromboembolism between the group that received 20 mg of enoxaparin (43 of 287 patients [15.0 percent]) and the placebo group. The incidence of adverse effects did not differ significantly between the placebo group and either enoxaparin group. By day 110, 50 patients had died in the placebo group (13.9 percent), 51 had died in the 20-mg group (14.7 percent), and 41 had died in the 40-mg group (11.4 percent); the differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic treatment with 40 mg of enoxaparin subcutaneously per day safely and effectively reduces the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with acute medical illnesses.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Anticoagulants in acute coronary syndromes.

Antithrombotic and antiplatelet agents, particularly unfractionated heparin and aspirin, are longstanding therapeutic mainstays for acute coronary syndromes such as unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). Early studies demonstrated that aspirin reduces the risk of mortality or nonfatal MI by 50-70% in patients presenting with unstable angina or non-Q-wave MI. Added to aspirin, heparin regimens further diminish the incidence of these myocardial ischemic events in the acute setting. Three major clinical studies demonstrated that such enhanced risk reductions can be achieved without significant increases in bleeding complications. The low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparin, dalteparin, proved superior to placebo but not unfractionated heparin in diminishing the incidence of (1) death or MI; (2) death, MI, or recurrence of angina; or (3) frequency of revascularization procedures. On the other hand, another LMW heparin, enoxaparin, did reduce these events at 14 and 30 days, as well as 1 year after treatment. The principal biophysical limitation of heparins, however, is that they cannot inactivate clot-bound thrombin, which probably contributes to morbidity and mortality in acute coronary syndromes. The natural leech-derived polypeptide hirudin and its derivatives (e.g., lepirudin) inactivate both fibrin-bound and free thrombin. Lepirudin has been approved in certain countries for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and is now being evaluated in the clinical management of acute myocardial ischemic syndromes. The well-documented pathophysiologic foundation for acute coronary syndromes is partial or intermittent thrombotic occlusion of a coronary artery as the result of atherosclerosis. Although a stable atherosclerotic plaque may not be clinically problematic, plaque rupture, which occurs under a variety of stimuli, touches off a cascade of enzymatic and cellular responses that frequently culminate in thrombotic occlusion. In the coronary circulation, such an occlusion may cause transmural MI, unstable angina, or non-Q-wave MI. Because the pathogenetic mechanisms of atherosclerosis with thrombotic complications have been elucidated, this knowledge can be translated into a rational clinical approach using antithrombotic therapies.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Patients who have a first episode of venous thromboembolism in the absence of known risk factors for thrombosis (idiopathic thrombosis) are often treated with anticoagulant therapy for three months. Such patients may benefit from longer treatment, however, because they appear to have an increased risk of recurrence after anticoagulant therapy is stopped. METHODS: In this double-blind study, we randomly assigned patients who had completed 3 months of anticoagulant therapy for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism to continue receiving warfarin, with the dose adjusted to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0, or to receive placebo for a further 24 months. Our goal was to determine the effects of extended anticoagulant therapy on rates of recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism and bleeding. RESULTS: A prespecified interim analysis of efficacy led to the early termination of the trial after 162 patients had been enrolled and followed for an average of 10 months. Of 83 patients assigned to continue to receive placebo, 17 had a recurrent episode of venous thromboembolism (27.4 percent per patient-year), as compared with 1 of 79 patients assigned to receive warfarin (1.3 percent per patient-year, P<0.001). Warfarin resulted in a 95 percent reduction in the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (95 percent confidence interval, 63 to 99 percent). Three patients assigned to the warfarin group had nonfatal major bleeding (two had gastrointestinal bleeding and one genitourinary bleeding), as compared with none of those assigned to the placebo group (3.8 vs. 0 percent per patient-year, P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism should be treated with anticoagulant agents for longer than three months.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1999

Management strategies in unstable coronary artery disease--current problems and future directions. The UCAD Council.

Unstable coronary artery disease continues to pose a major challenge to clinicians. The advent of new therapies, such as percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, low-molecular-weight heparins, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, provides new management options for this indication but also raises new questions with regard to optimal management. Prospective randomized trials with well-defined, long-term outcome measures and a means of identifying which patients will derive most benefit from each treatment, together with a means of rapid and clear dissemination of study results and implications, are required in order to advance the management of unstable coronary artery disease.

Angina, Unstable↗
PubMed1999

Low-molecular-weight heparins in acute unstable coronary artery disease - an update.

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been rigorously evaluated in the management of acute coronary ischaemia. The results of clinical trials suggest that the LMWHs (enoxaparin, dalteparin and nadroparin) are effective and safe in the treatment of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Two studies have shown enoxaparin to be more effective than unfractionated heparin in this setting. Furthermore, the pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic characteristics of LMWHs result in them having practical and economic advantages. Data on the benefits of long-term therapy with LMWHs are conflicting.

Angina, Unstable↗
PubMed1999

Prediction of deep vein thrombosis after elective hip replacement surgery by preoperative clinical and haemostatic variables: the ECAT DVT Study. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis.

The European Concerted Action on Thrombosis (ECAT) DVT Study was a collaborative study of preoperative haemostatic tests in prediction of DVT (diagnosed by routine bilateral venography) after elective hip replacement. 480 patients were recruited in 11 centres across Europe. Clinical risk factors were assessed, and stored citrated plasma aliquots were centrally assayed for 29 haemostatic factors according to the ECAT methodology. 120 (32%) of 375 evaluable patients had DVT, and 41 (11%) had proximal DVT. Among clinical variables, DVT was significantly associated with increased age, obesity, and possibly non-use of stockings. Of the 29 haemostatic factors, mean preoperative levels were significantly higher in patients with subsequent DVT (on univariate analyses) for factor VIII activity, prothrombin fragment F1+2, thrombin-antithrombin complexes, and fibrin D-dimer; and significantly lower for APTT and APC sensitivity ratio. Factor V Leiden was also associated with DVT. Most of these variables were also associated with age, while D-dimer was higher in patients with varicose veins. On multivariate analyses including clinical variables, only a shorter APTT (locally but not centrally performed) and APC resistance showed a statistically significant association with DVT. We conclude that (a) DVT is common after elective hip replacement despite prophylaxis; (b) the study provides some evidence that DVT is associated with a preoperative hypercoaguable state; and (c) preoperative haemostatic tests do not add significantly to prediction of DVT from clinical variables, with the possible exception of APC resistance.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Customizing our approach in deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism treatment: overview of our clinical experience.

Until recently, the management of established deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism remained largely unchanged and unchallenged. Treatment comprised an initial intravenous bolus of unfractionated heparin (UFH), followed by dose-adjusted intravenous UFH for 5-7 days, and oral warfarin for three months. UFH is traditionally administered in hospital, and monitoring and dose adjustment remain essential features of both UFH and warfarin treatment, making therapy both costly and inconvenient. Recent clinical trials have shown that subcutaneous UFH, or low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), administered subcutaneously at a weight-adjusted fixed dose, are at least as effective as standard UFH given intravenously in the treatment of DVT. The feasibility of initial treatment of DVT at home in selected patients, with associated cost-savings and improved convenience have also been demonstrated with LMWHs. Clinical trials are currently investigating the potential value of LMWHs in the treatment of pulmonary embolism and as an alternative to warfarin in secondary prevention of DVT. The role of newer anticoagulants, such as recombinant hirudin, in initial treatment of DVT, and of thrombolysis in the management of pulmonary embolism remain to be defined.

Disease Management↗