Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A G Hohmann

Publications and source records attributed to A G Hohmann.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Suppression of noxious stimulus-evoked activity in the ventral posterolateral nucleus of the thalamus by a cannabinoid agonist: correlation between electrophysiological and antinociceptive effects.

The CNS contains a putative cannabinergic neurotransmitter and an abundance of G-protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors. However, little is known about the function of this novel neurochemical system. Cannabinold agonists produce antinociception in behavioral tests, suggesting the possibility that this system serves in part to modulate pain sensitivity. To explore this possibility, the effects of the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 on nociceptive neurons in the ventroposterolateral (VPL) nucleus of the thalamus were examined in urethane-anesthetized rats. After identification of a nociresponsive neuron, a computer-controlled device delivered graded pressure stimuli to the contralateral hindpaw. WIN 55,212-2 (0.0625, 0.125, and 0.25 mg/kg, i.v.) suppressed noxious stimulus-evoked activity of VPL neurons in a dose-dependent and reversible manner. Noxious stimulus-evoked firing was affected more than spontaneous firing. These effects were apparently mediated by cannabinoid receptors, because the cannabinoid receptor-inactive enantiomer of the drug (WIN 55,212-3, 0.25 mg/kg) failed to alter the activity of this population of cells. Administration of morphine (0.5 mg/kg, i.v.) produced effects that were very similar to those produced by the cannabinoid. WIN 55,212-2 (0.25 mg/kg, i.v.) failed to alter the responses of non-nociceptive low-threshold mechanosensitive neurons in the VPL WIN 55,212-2 produced antinociceptive effects with a potency and time course similar to that observed in the electrophysiological experiments, despite the differences in the anesthetic states of the animals used in these experiments. The antinociceptive and electrophysiological effects on VPL neurons outlasted the motor effects of the drug. Furthermore, the changes in nociceptive responding could not be attributed to changes in skin temperature. Taken together, these findings suggest that cannabinoids decrease nociceptive neurotransmission at the level of the thalamus and that one function of endogenous cannabinoids may be to modulate pain sensitivity.

Analgesics↗
PubMed1996

Suppression of noxious stimulus-evoked expression of Fos protein-like immunoreactivity in rat spinal cord by a selective cannabinoid agonist.

In rats, cannabinoids inhibit behavioral responses to noxious stimulation with a potency and efficacy similar to that of morphine. However, because cannabinoids depress motor function, it has not been possible to state beyond any doubt that these effects were related to a dampening of noxious sensory input. Therefore, c-fos immunocytochemistry was used to explore the possibility that cannabinoids reduce behavioral responses to noxious stimuli by decreasing spinal processing of nociceptive inputs. Rats received systemic injections of the potent and selective cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2, the receptor-inactive enantiomer WIN 55,212-3 or vehicle prior to observations in a model of tonic pain, the formalin test. As demonstrated previously, plantar injections of formalin led to lifting and licking of the injected paw, with two peaks of activity occurring at 5 and 30 min after injection. The cannabinoid agonist suppressed these pain responses and produced a reduction in mobility. Immunocytochemical processing of sections with an antibody to the Fos protein revealed that the cannabinoid markedly suppressed pain-evoked c-fos expression in the superficial and neck regions of the spinal dorsal horn, but not in the nucleus proprius. Decreased expression of c-fos also occurred in the ventral horn. The specificity of this effect and its probable mediation by cannabinoid receptors are suggested by three findings: (i) the suppression by the drug of both behavioral and immunocytochemical responses to pain was dose-dependent; (ii) neither the behavioral nor the immunocytochemical response to the noxious stimulus was significantly affected by the receptor-inactive enantiomer of the agonist; (iii) animals rendered tolerant to cannabinoids by repeated injections of the agonist showed reduced responses to the drug. These findings suggest that cannabinoids inhibit the spinal processing of nociceptive stimuli and support the notion that endogenous cannabinoids may act naturally to modify pain trnasmission within the central nervous system.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Inhibition of noxious stimulus-evoked activity of spinal cord dorsal horn neurons by the cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2.

The effects of a potent synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 on nociceptive responses of wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons in the lumbar spinal cord were investigated in anesthetized rats. WDR neurons were identified by their responses to innocuous brushing and to a range of pressure stimuli from innocuous to noxious. Noxious pressure was applied to regions of the ipsilateral hind paw corresponding to the receptive field of the neuron. WIN 55,212-2 (125 micrograms/kg and 250 micrograms/kg, i.v.) produced a profound inhibition of firing evoked by the noxious pressure stimulus. By contrast, the cannabinoid did not alter the evoked activity of non-nociceptive neurons in response to non-noxious levels of stimulation. Treatment with either vehicle or the inactive enantiomer WIN 55,212-3 (250 micrograms/kg) failed to alter noxious stimulus-evoked activity of WDR neurons. These data provide direct evidence for cannabinoid-mediated inhibition of pain neurotransmission in the spinal dorsal horn. The site of action for these effects remains to be determined.

Analgesics↗
PubMed1994

Regional variation in the ratio of sigma 1 to sigma 2 binding in rat brain.

In vitro binding experiments were performed to determine whether known subtypes of the putative sigma receptor exhibit a differential distribution across brain regions and species. Rat brains were dissected into nine regions, pooled, and used to prepare membranes for ligand binding studies. Whole guinea pig brains were prepared in an identical manner for comparison to rat. sigma 1 Receptors were labeled with [3H](+)-pentazocine. sigma 2 Receptors were labeled with [3H]1,3-di-o-tolylguanidine (DTG) in the presence of 1 microM dextrallorphan to mask sigma 1 sites. Non-specific binding was determined in the presence of 10 microM haloperidol. Filtration and scintillation spectroscopy provided the binding values. The experiment revealed marked variation in the ratio of sigma 2 to sigma 1 binding across brain regions ranging from a low of 1.63 in the hindbrain to 3.51 in the cerebellum, that result mainly differences in the density of the receptors. Scatchard analysis on membranes derived from the hindbrain and cortex suggested that the effects were due primarily to regional differences in densities of receptor subtypes rather than different affinities. Guinea pig brain showed a marked preponderance of sigma 1 receptors with a ratio (sigma 2/sigma 1) of 0.67. These findings demonstrate that sigma 1 and sigma 2 receptors are differentially distributed in rat brain.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Effects of 1,3-di-o-tolylguanidine (DTG), a sigma ligand, on local cerebral glucose utilization in rat brain.

The 2-deoxy-D-[1-14C]glucose ([14C]DG) method was used to examine the effects of the relatively selective sigma ligand 1,3-di-o-tolylguanidine (DTG) on cerebral metabolism in freely moving rats. Each animal received an i.p. injection of DTG (0.2, 1, or 5 mg/kg) or normal saline 20 min prior to the infusion of [14C]DG. DTG induced dose-dependent changes in local cerebral glucose utilization (LCGU) in several motor and limbic structures. Most structures showed increases in LCGU, with a maximum effect at 1 mg/kg. The most profound increases in LCGU were observed in brain regions that are rich in sigma receptors. These included cerebellar and related nuclei (interpositus, lateral and medial cerebellar n., vestibular n., olivary n.), ambiguus n., superior colliculus (superior layers), hippocampus (CA2, CA3, DG), n. basalis of Meynert interpeduncular n., and the substantia nigra pars compacta and pars reticulata. No significant decreases in glucose utilization were observed at any dose. Although the areas affected by DTG are similar to those previously reported for other sigma ligands, future studies employing a range of doses for additional selective sigma ligands must be carried out in order to confirm whether these changes in LCGU were sigma-mediated.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Autoradiographic distribution of [3H](+)-pentazocine and [3H]1,3-di-o-tolylguanidine (DTG) binding sites in guinea pig brain: a comparative study.

Binding studies suggested the selectivity of (+)-pentazocine for sigma receptors, and subsequent synthesis and testing of [3H](+)-pentazocine confirmed its high potency and selectivity for sigma sites. Newer data have demonstrated the selectivity of (+)-pentazocine for a subtype of the sigma receptor called sigma-1. Based on these findings, the distribution of [3H](+)-pentazocine binding sites in the guinea pig brain was examined using in vitro autoradiography. [3H](+)-Pentazocine binding was high in the cingulate cortex, dorsal diagonal band, periaqueductal gray, cerebellum and cranial nerve nuclei. It was relatively low in the nucleus accumbens, neocortical areas and caudate nucleus. A significant correlation was found between the binding of [3H](+)-pentazocine and [3H]1,3-di-o-tolylguanidine, a selective sigma ligand across brain regions. However, certain nuclei exhibited markedly different ratios of binding of the two ligands. Since DTG is not selective for the sigma subtypes, while (+)-pentazocine is selective for the sigma-1 type, the data are suggestive of relative differences in the distributions of sigma-1 and sigma-2 sites.

Animals↗