Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A G Baird

Publications and source records attributed to A G Baird.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Rural deprivation: reflecting reality.

In the United Kingdom (UK) there is currently an upsurge of interest in rural affairs. This brings the potential to address some of the gaps in rural health care research. The appropriate description and measurement of rural deprivation is one area consistently identified by UK rural practitioners and policymakers as urgently requiring evidence. Appropriate identification and measurement of deprivation within a rural context is important so that primary care resources can be targeted at those with greatest need. It is believed that current measures of deprivation are inappropriate for rural settings, but relationships between life circumstances and health are only beginning to be addressed by empirical research. In this paper we propose an approach to researching rural deprivation. It is important to be clear about definitions of rurality and deprivation and about the purpose of measurement. The requirement to test a range of indicators for their association with health status and health care need in rural areas and to gather more locally relevant data within primary care settings is highlighted. The relevance, for primary care, of exploring rural deprivation is suggested, along with ideas about a way forward in generating knowledge that can help to characterise and measure rural deprivation in a more sensitive manner.

Cultural Deprivation↗

Management of labour in an isolated rural maternity hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of a maternity unit run by general practitioners and midwives, describing the outcome of labour in an unselected group of women and quantifying the contribution made by general practitioners. DESIGN: Retrospective population based review of obstetric patients who had access to an isolated rural maternity unit. SETTING: Rural area 120 km from a consultant maternity unit. SUBJECTS: 997 consecutive women delivered between January 1987 and May 1991. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mode of delivery and complications by place of booking and place of delivery; need for medical intervention and transfer. RESULTS: 530 women (53%) were booked for delivery in the rural unit; this group had a caesarean section rate of 3.8% and an unplanned transfer rate of 12.8% to the consultant unit in labour. Of the 462 who delivered in the low risk unit, 25 (5%) required a forceps delivery; postnatal complications requiring emergency medical support occurred in a further 33 (7%). CONCLUSIONS: Risk characterisation is possible, but medical support from general practitioners and obstetricians is required in almost a third of women at low risk for complications of delivery. Results of this study support the team approach to obstetric management but not the move towards isolated units without organised medical support.

Cesarean Section↗

Lyme disease.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Family Practice↗