Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Fingerhut

Publications and source records attributed to A Fingerhut.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Can laparoscopy reduce hospital stay in the treatment of Crohn's disease?

PURPOSE: The aim of this article was to investigate the safety, outcome, length of stay, and cost of hospital admission in patients with Crohn's disease who underwent laparoscopy compared with open surgery. METHODS: Among 51 consecutive patients with inflammatory bowel disease (1996-2000), 46 with Crohn's disease were included in this nonrandomized prospective study. Of these, 20 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and 26 underwent open surgery. Data collected included the following information: age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis, duration of disease, preoperative medical treatment, previous abdominal surgery, present indication for surgery, and procedure performed (comparability measures), as well as conversion to open surgery, operating time, time to resolution of ileus, morbidity, duration of hospital stay, and cost of hospital admission (outcome measures). RESULTS: There was no significant difference with respect to comparability measures between the laparoscopic and the open-surgery groups. There was no mortality. There was no intraoperative complication in either group and no conversion in the laparoscopic group. Operating time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (302 minutes) vs. the open group (244.7 minutes) (P < 0.05), but this difference disappeared when data were adjusted for the extra time required to perform the laparoscopic hand-sewn anastomoses (288.2 minutes vs. 244.7 minutes). Bowel function returned more quickly in the laparoscopic group vs. the open group in terms of passage of flatus (3.7 vs. 4.7 days) (P < 0.05) and resumption of oral intake (4.2 vs. 6.3 day) (P < 0.01). There were significantly fewer postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group (9.5 percent) vs. the open group (18.5 percent) (P < 0.05); the length of stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (8.3 days) vs. the open group (13.2 days) (P < 0.01); and the cost of hospital admission was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group ($6106, United States dollars) vs. the open group ($9829, United States dollars) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There is a reduction in the postoperative ileus, length of stay, cost of hospital admission, and postoperative complication rate in the laparoscopic group. Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease is safe, and it is potentially more cost-effective than traditional open surgery.

Adult↗

Harmonic scalpel in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: With advances in laparoscopy, various hemostatic procedures have been advocated with variable results. Using currently available tools, some steps in laparoscopic colorectal surgery still represent technical challenges. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility and reliability of the Harmonic Scalpel in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS: In this nonrandomized prospective study, 34 consecutive patients (15 males; mean age, 46 (range, 24-80) years) underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery for benign disease (27 patients) and colorectal cancer (7 patients). Dissection, hemostasis, coagulation, and division of several types of vascular pedicles were performed exclusively with the Harmonic Scalpel. The 10-mm-blade Harmonic Scalpel device was used at full power mode for all purposes through a 10-mm port. Coagulation of vascular pedicles was always achieved with the blades in the flat position. The large pedicles (inferior mesenteric, right and left colic, and ileocolic) were coagulated for 20 seconds in several locations along the length (1 cm) before final division. Smaller vascular pedicles were coagulated for ten seconds before division. When the vein and the artery of major pedicles were divided at their origin, either for malignancy or for technical reasons, they were dissected and coagulated separately. For more limited resection of the mesentery, as in the case of benign disease, vascular pedicles were coagulated together as a single bundle. Operative time, minor or major intraoperative or postoperative hemorrhage, need for conversion to laparotomy, bowel injury, and trocar complications were recorded. All anastomoses were checked on Day 8 by a diatrizoate sodium enema. RESULTS: There was no mortality. Mean operative time was 276 (range, 200-520) minutes. Neither minor nor uncontrollable hemorrhage occurred; no conversion to laparotomy and no vascular or bowel injury were recorded. There was one port-site hematoma. Neither hemoperitoneum, intraperitoneal hematoma, fistula, nor intra-abdominal abscess was observed. CONCLUSION: Coagulation and division of minor as well as major vascular pedicles in laparoscopic colorectal surgery with the Harmonic Scalpel" are technically easy, feasible, and reliable.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in the prevention of postoperative infectious complications and sub-optimal recovery from operation in patients with colorectal cancer and increased preoperative risk (ASA 3 and 4). Protocol of a controlled clinical trial developed by consensus of an international study group. Part one: rationale and hypothesis.

GENERAL DESIGN: Presentation of a novel study protocol to evalue the effectiveness of an immune modifier (rhG-CSF, filgrastim): prevention of postoperative infectious complications and sub-optimal recovery from operation in patients with colorectal cancer and increased preoperative risk (ASA 3 and 4). The rationale and hypothesis are presented in this part of the protocol of the randomised, placebo controlled, double-blinded, single-centre study performed at an university hospital (n = 40 patients for each group). OBJECTIVE: Part one of this protocol describes the concepts of three major sections of the study: Definition of optimum and sub-optimal recovery after operation. Recovery, as an outcome, is not a simple univariate endpoint, but a complex construction of mechanistic variables (i. e. death, complications and health status assessed by the surgeon), quality of life expressed by the patient, and finally a weighted outcome judgement by both the patient and the surgeon (true endpoint). Its conventional early assessment within 14-28 days is artificial: longer periods (such as 6 months) are needed for the patient to state: "I am now as well as I was before". Identification of suitable target patients: the use of biological response modifiers (immune modulators) in addition to traditional prophylaxes (i. e. antibiotics, heparin, volume substitutes) may improve postoperative outcome in appropriate selected patients with reduced host defence and increased immunological stress response, but these have to be defined. Patients classified as ASA 3 and 4 (American Society for Anaesthesiologists) and with colorectal cancer will be studied to prove this hypothesis. Choice of biological response modifier: Filgrastim has been chosen as an example of a biological response modifier because it was effective in a new study type, clinic-modelling randomised trials in rodents, and has shown promise in some clinical trials for indications other than preoperative prophylaxis. It has also enhanced host defence and has been anti-inflammatory in basic research. CONCLUSION: The following hypothesis will be tested in patients with operations for colorectal cancer and increased preoperative risk (ASA 3 and 4): is the outcome as evaluated by the hermeneutic endpoint (quality of life expressed by the patient) and mechanistic endpoints (mortality rate, complication rate, relative hospital stay, assessed by the doctor) improved in the group receiving filgrastim prophylaxis in comparison with the placebo group? Quality of life will be the first primary endpoint in the hierarchical, statistical testing of confirmatory analysis.

Bacterial Infections↗

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in the prevention of postoperative infectious complications and sub-optimal recovery from operation in patients with colorectal cancer and increased preoperative risk (ASA 3 and 4). Protocol for a controlled clinical trial developed by consensus of an international study group. Part two: design of the study.

GENERAL DESIGN: Presentation of a new type of a study protocol for evaluation of the effectiveness of an immune modifier (rhG-CSF, filgrastim): prevention of postoperative infectious complications and of sub-optimal recovery from operation in patients with colorectal cancer and increased preoperative risk (ASA 3 and 4). This part describes the design of the randomised, placebo controlled, double-blinded, single-centre study performed at an university hospital (n = 40 patients for each group). OBJECTIVE: The trial design includes the following elements for a prototype protocol: * The study population is restricted to patients with colorectal cancer, including a left sided resection and an increased perioperative risk (ASA 3 and 4). * Patients are allocated by random to the control or treatment group. * The double blinding strategy of the trial is assessed by psychometric indices. * An endpoint construct with quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and a recovery index (modified Mc Peek index) are used as primary endpoints. Qualitative analysis of clinical relevance of the endpoints is performed by both patients and doctors. * Statistical analysis uses an area under the curve (AUC) model for improvement of quality of life on leaving hospital and two and six months after operation. A confirmatory statistical model with quality of life as the first primary endpoint in the hierarchic test procedure is used. Expectations of patients and surgeons and the negative affect are analysed by social psychological scales. CONCLUSION: This study design differs from other trials on preoperative prophylaxis and postoperative recovery, and has been developed to try a new concept and avoid previous failures.

Clinical Protocols↗

Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Results of an experts' meeting.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of incisional hernia (IH) is a current problem in modern surgery. Many important aspects of incisional hernia surgery are yet to be answered, especially the choice of surgical technique and its adaptation to the individual patient. The aim of this experts' meeting was to resolve some current questions in incisional hernia surgery and to organise an international hernia register. METHODS: An international panel of ten experts met under the auspices of the European Hernia Society (GREPA) to investigate the classification and therapeutic alternatives for incisional hernia. Prior to the conference, all experts were asked to submit their arguments in the form of published results. All papers received were weighted according to their scientific quality and relevance. The information from this correspondence was used as a basis for panel discussion. The personal experiences of the participants and other aspects of individualised therapy were also considered. RESULTS: The expert panel suggested a new classification of incisional hernia based on localisation, size, recurrences and symptoms. All experts agreed that the fascia duplication and the fascia adaptation should only be used for small incisional hernias. Fascia duplication is of value only in the horizontal direction. The technical details and the pros and cons of each procedure were discussed for prosthetic implantation using onlay and sublay techniques and the technique of autodermal hernioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: The management of incisional hernia is currently not standardised. In order to answer relevant questions of incisional hernia surgery, an international hernia register should be established.

Hernia, Ventral↗

Lavage by laparoscopy fares better than lavage by laparotomy: experimental evidence.

BACKGROUND: Although carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum is proposed increasingly for treatment of secondary peritonitis, associated deleterious effects have been reported in experimental models, with the hypothesis that increased intraperitoneal pressure might facilitate bacterial translocation. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome (and qualitative microbiologic analysis) from peritonitis in rats after lavage by laparoscopy with the outcome after lavage by laparotomy. METHODS: After determination of the standard innoculum for this study in 30 animals, 120 male Wistar rats received 1 ml of Escherichi coli 10(6) colony-forming unit (CFU), Bacteroides fragilis 10(7) CFU, Enterococcus faecalis 10(7) CFU in a sterile rat feces-barium sulfate suspension adjuvant, were anesthetized with intramuscular ketamine, and then underwent peritoneal lavage by either laparotomy (n = 60) or laparoscopy (n = 60). The duration of peritonitis defined two groups: group A: duration less than 3 h (n = 20) and group B: duration 3 h or more (n = 40). Both groups underwent successive lavage with 10-ml aliquots (total, 50 ml) of 0.9% saline solution at 37 degrees C. Five 2-ml samples of liquid lavage were drawn for culture and microbiologic analysis. Blood (0.2 ml) and peritoneal liquid lavage samples were incubated 48 h at 37 degrees C and cultured. RESULTS: All the animals survived. Mean duration of peritoneal lavage was 13.2 min (range, 6-25 min) for laparoscopy and 9.7 min (range, 6-15 min) and for laparotomy. The difference was not statistically significant. The mean duration of operation was significantly longer with laparoscopy than with laparotomy: 44.5 min (range, 35-62 min) and 25 min (range, 16-40 min), respectively (p = 0.0001). The collected lavage volumes were not statistically different: 48.5 ml (range, 40-54 ml) and 46.7 ml (range, 37-56 ml), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups in terms of E. coli bacteremia, irrespective of peritonitis duration. The rates of positive blood culture for B. fragilis and E. faecalis were signficantly lower after laparoscopy than after laparotomy, both in the overall group (p = 0.025 and p = 0.045, respectively) and when duration of peritonitis exceeded 3 h (p = 0.001 and p = 0.044, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this animal model of secondary peritonitis, lavage by laparoscopy was associated with less bacteremia for B. fragilis and E. faecalis than peritoneal lavage by laparotomy.

Animals↗

Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery is thought to promote early recovery and quicker return to bowel function. The objective was to evaluate the rate and predictive factors of success, the causes of failure, the morbidity, and mortality during and after hospitalization, as well as to determine whether laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction offers the same benefits as for other laparoscopic procedures. METHODS: The records of 308 patients with acute small bowel obstruction treated laparoscopically in 35 centres between 1 October 1988 and 30 September 1996 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Treatment was implemented completely by laparoscopy ('success' group) in 168 patients (54.6%). Conversion to laparotomy ('failure' group) was required in 140 patients (45.4%; during the same operation in 126 patients and after a median delay of 4 days (range: 1-12 days) in 14 patients). There were significantly more successes in patients with a history of one or two surgical interventions than in those with more than two (56% vs 37%; P < 0.05). There were significantly more successes in patients who had undergone appendectomy only (67/94; 71%) than in patients who (i) had no antecedent surgery (52%; P < 0.05), or (ii) underwent other surgery (33%; P < 0.001). The rate of success was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in patients operated on early (< 24 h) and in patients with bands (54%), than in those with adhesions (31%) or with other causes of obstruction (15%). The median duration of postoperative ileus was significantly shorter in the 'success' group than in the 'failure' group (2 days vs 4 days; P < 0.001). The median duration of postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the 'success' group than in the 'failure' group (4 days vs 10 days; P < 0.001). Fewer immediate wound complications were sustained in the 'success' group than in the 'failure' group (1.2% vs 10.7%; P < 0.001). The total number of immediate or delayed complications and particularly the number of recurrent obstructions after hospitalization as well as the number of deaths did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Successful laparoscopic treatment of small bowel obstruction can be expected in patients who are seen early, and who have had one or two previous interventions (particularly appendectomy, especially if bands are found).

Acute Disease↗

Binding of AP2 to sorting signals is modulated by AP2 phosphorylation.

The two clathrin-associated adaptor complexes AP1 and AP2 are known to participate in the formation of clathrin-coated vesicles at the trans-Golgi network and at the plasma membrane. During this process adaptors are involved in the sequestration of vesicle cargo by binding to the sorting signals within the cytoplasmic domains of the cargo proteins and in the recruitment of the clathrin coat. After budding of the clathrin-coated vesicles, the clathrin and adaptors dissociate from the vesicles. Here we show that in vitro binding of AP2 to sorting signals, which is one of the initial steps in receptor-mediated endocytosis, is modulated by adaptor phosphorylation. AP2 was phosphorylated by incubating purified AP2 in the presence of ATP and dephosphorylated by incubation with alkaline phosphatase. Affinity for tyrosine-, leucine-based and noncanonical sorting motifs was 15-33 times higher for phosphorylated than for dephosphorylated AP2. Also the binding of AP2 to membranes was regulated by adaptor phosphorylation/dephosphorylation and was about 8-fold higher for phosphorylated than for dephosphorylated AP2. Moreover, AP2 isolated from cytosol is higher phosphorylated than membrane-extracted and exhibits a 5-fold higher binding affinity than AP2 extracted from membranes. Taken together these data point to a cycle of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation as a mechanism for regulating the reversible association of AP2 with membranes and sorting signals during the process of receptor-mediated endocytosis.

Adaptor Protein Complex 1↗

Lymphatic involvement in early gastric cancer: prevalence and prognosis in France.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of early gastric cancer (EGC) is considered better than that of invasive gastric carcinoma, with a 5-year survival rate of more than 90% after surgery. The prevalence of lymph node metastasis in EGC ranges from 8% to 20% and is associated with a poor prognosis. HYPOTHESIS: The main prognostic factor of EGC in patients in France is lymphatic involvement. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: From January 1979 to December 1988, 332 patients with EGC were operated on in 23 centers of 2 of the French Associations for Surgical Research. Clinical, pathological, and therapeutic data were reviewed, and the reckoning point was in June 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The cumulative 5- and 7-year specific survival rates of EGC with or without lymphatic involvement. RESULTS: The cumulative 5- and 7-year specific survival rates of 332 patients with EGC (mean follow-up time, 80 months), excluding both operative and unrelated mortality, were 92% and 87.5%, respectively. Thirty-four patients (10.2%) had metastatic lymphatic spread: 13 exclusively in the lymphatic vessels close to the tumor, 17 in at least 1 lymph node, and 4 in both the lymphatic vessels and nodes. The rate of lymph node involvement (regardless of lymphatic vessel involvement) correlated significantly with submucosal invasion (P =. 05) and histologic undifferentiation (P =.03). Lymphatic vessel involvement correlated positively with lymph node involvement (P =. 003). Since 5- and 7-year survival rates of the 13 patients with EGC who had lymphatic vessel involvement without lymph node involvement did not differ significantly from those of patients who had EGC with lymph node involvement (85% and 84% vs 72% and 63%, respectively [P =.42]), all patients with lymph node and/or lymphatic vessel involvement were considered unique. Prognosis was poorest in these patients according to both univariate analysis (94% for 298 without node or vessel involvement vs 78% for 34 with node and/or vessel involvement; P =.006) and multivariate analysis (P =.01). Submucosal invasion was a prognostic factor independent of lymphatic involvement (P =.05). Five- and 7-year survival rates did not differ when the group of 211 patients for whom less than 15 lymph nodes were retrieved were compared with those (n = 51) for whom 15 or more lymph nodes were retrieved (95.5% vs 92% and 95.5% vs 88%, respectively), whether according to univariate (P =.21) or multivariate (P =.31) analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that both lymph node and lymphatic vessel involvement are important prognostic factors in patients with EGC. Lymphadenectomy in EGC is important to identify the high-risk population for whom prognosis is worse. The extent of lymphadenectomy (at least 15 nodes) in these patients, however, does not alter prognosis.

Adult↗

Prevalence and mechanisms of small intestinal obstruction following laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a retrospective multicenter study. French Association for Surgical Research.

HYPOTHESIS: The prevalence and mechanisms of intestinal obstruction following laparoscopic abdominal surgery have not been studied extensively. DESIGN: Retrospective review of cases of intestinal obstruction after laparoscopic surgery. SETTING: Sixteen surgical units performing laparoscopy in France. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients with intestinal obstruction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence values and descriptive data. RESULTS: The 3 most frequent primary procedures responsible for intestinal obstruction were cholecystectomy (10 cases), transperitoneal hernia repair (5 cases), and appendectomy (4 cases). Prevalences of early postoperative intestinal obstruction after these procedures were 0.11%, 2.5%, and 0.16%, respectively. Intestinal obstruction was due to adhesions or fibrotic bands in 12 cases and to intestinal incarceration in 11 cases. Obstruction was located at the trocar site in 13 cases (9 incarcerations and 4 adhesions), mainly at the umbilicus, and in the operative field in 10 cases (2 incarcerations in a wall defect after transperitoneal inguinal hernia repair, 4 adhesions, and 4 fibrotic bands). The small intestine was involved in 23 of 24 cases; the other was due to cecal volvulus following unrecognized intestinal malrotation. Intestinal obstruction was treated by laparoscopic adhesiolysis in 6 patients and by laparotomy in 18 patients, 6 of whom required small intestine resection. Three postoperative complications but no deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Intestinal obstruction following laparoscopic abdominal surgery can occur irrespective of the type of operation; the prevalence is as high as (cholecystectomy and appendectomy) or even higher than (transperitoneal hernia repair) that seen in open procedures.

Abdomen↗

Surgical treatment of complicated duodenal ulcers: controlled trials.

Indications for surgery of duodenal ulcer (DU) have changed radically because of the efficacy of H(2)-antagonists, endoscopic procedures, and eradication of Helicobacter pylorus. The aim of this study was to analyze the current literature to determine if definitive surgery is still relevant for complicated DU (bleeding, perforation, gastric outlet obstruction). Two studies have compared early to late surgery in terms of bleeding. One recommended early surgery (significant reduction in mortality) in the elderly, but no statistically significant difference was found when analyzed with "intention to treat." In the other, mortality with early surgery was five times higher than with expectant therapy (when it was possible). Two studies comparing different surgical techniques for bleeding favored the radical procedure. Of at least 15 studies comparing endoscopic treatments, however, none has compared endoscopic therapy to surgical intervention for bleeding DU. One trial, comparing nonoperative to surgical treatment for perforation, found similar rates of morbidity, intraabdominal abscess, and mortality; but the hospital stay was longer (p < 0.001). Nonoperative treatment failed more often (p < 0.05) in patients over age 70. In three trials, postoperative morbidity (excepting wound sepsis in one) was not significantly increased by definitive surgery, with less ulcer recurrence (p < 0.05) compared with simple closure. Laparoscopy (versus laparotomy) was shown to take longer (p < 0.001) but required less postoperative analgesics (p < 0.03); there were no statistically significant differences as concerns the duration of nasogastric aspiration, intravenous drips, hospital stay, time to resume normal diet, Visual Analogous Scale pain scores for the first 24 hours after surgery, morbidity, reoperation rate, or mortality. Of 48 laparoscopic patients, 11 (23%) underwent conversion to open surgery. Three surgical techniques [highly selective vagotomy (HSU) + gastrojejunostomy (group 1), HSV + Jaboulay gastroduodenostomy (group 2), or selective vagotomy (group 3) + antrectomy) for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO)] showed that although postoperative results were similar (except wound sepsis in one trial), long-term Visick scores were significantly (p < 0.01) better in group 1 than in group 2, but not in group 3. Further studies are needed to determine the exact prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in complicated DU and to compare (1) definitive to minimal surgery (stop the bleeding or close the perforation) combined with antisecretory drugs and eradication of H. pylori; (2) surgery to endoscopic treatment combined with eradication of H. pylori; and (3) for GOO, surgery to balloon dilatation combined with eradication of H. pylori.

Duodenal Ulcer↗

Prevention of deep abdominal complications with omentoplasty on the raw surface after hepatic resection. The French Associations for Surgical Research.

BACKGROUND: Several methods have been suggested to treat the hepatic raw surface after resection. Among these, omentoplasty (OP) has been employed occasionally but there are no clinical studies that clearly demonstrate its usefulness. METHODS: Of 172 randomized patients undergoing hepatic resection between January 1991 and December 1994, 5 were withdrawn for protocol violation, leaving 167 who were randomly allotted to undergo OP (n = 87) on the hepatic raw surface or not (NO; n = 80). This procedure was performed for malignant tumor in 125 cases, benign tumor in 33, and for other causes in 15. Six patients had more than two types of lesions, and 32 patients had associated cirrhosis. Sixty-five major and 102 minor hepatic resections were performed. The main outcome measures studied were the number of patients with deep abdominal complications (DAC; deep bleeding or hematoma, deep infection, with or without pus discharge through drains, bile leakage), as well as repeat operations and postoperative death. Patients were divided into two strata according to the site of the lesion with respect to the diaphragm: (1) in contact (posterosuperior segments II, VII and VIII) or (2) not in contact (anterior segments III, IV, V, and VI). RESULTS: Both groups were comparable as regards patient demographics, intraoperative procedures, intraoperative search for bile leaks and intraoperative transfusion requirements. Fewer patients had DAC in OP (n = 11) than in NO (n = 15) (difference not significant). Ten patients (6%) required repeat operations: 4 in OP without immediate mortality and 6 in NO, 3 followed by death. One further patient in OP required repeat operation after discharge and died. Four patients died in OP and 7 in NO, 1 and 4 of DAC, respectively (not significant). Deep abdominal complications were significantly associated with major hepatic resection (P <0.05) whereas postoperative death was significantly correlated with cirrhosis (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: OP on the raw surface after hepatic resection lowers the rate of all complications related to DAC (except biliary leaks) and their severity (repeat operations and death) but not significantly so. OP is not recommended as a routine measure to complete elective hepatic resections.

Abdomen↗