Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Dagianti

Publications and source records attributed to A Dagianti.

106 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

Assessment of diastolic left ventricular filling by echocardiographic automated border detection and comparison with radionuclide ventriculography.

To determine whether indexes obtained from a newly developed echocardiographic automated border detection (ABD) technology provide a reliable estimate of left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling, ABD variables of LV filling were compared with volumetric measurements determined by radionuclide angiography. Forty-two patients with a variety of heart diseases (age range, 11 to 76 years) underwent ABD echocardiographic studies on the same day as the radionuclide examination. Technically adequate ABD data could be obtained in 31 patients (74%). Nineteen healthy subjects served as normal controls. Area-time and volume-time waveforms for echocardiographic measurements were obtained from LV short-axis views at the level of the papillary muscles and four-chamber apical views. Both the diastolic indexes derived from the waveform of area change (short-axis view) and volume change (four-chamber apical view) correlated with radionuclide variables. Values measured from the ABD area-time waveform showed the following correlations: peak filling rate (r = 0.86; standard error of the estimate [SEE] = 0.62), time to peak filling rate (r = 0.85; SEE = 23.11), rapid filling phase fractional change (r = 0.79; SEE = 5.51), and atrial filling phase fractional change (r = 0.71; SEE = 5.82). Correlations of indexes derived from the ABD volume-time waveform were as follows: peak filling rate (r = 0.87; SEE = 0.50), time to peak filling rate (r = 0.90; SEE = 22.03), rapid filling fractional change (r = 0.83; SEE = 5.33), and atrial filling fractional change (r = 0.77; SEE = 4.68). ABD LV filling parameters in patients with heart disease and normal control subjects were significantly different. Thus ABD data from short-axis and apical views have a strong linear relation with radionuclide ventriculographic measurements and may be used as a method to assess LV diastolic filling.

Adolescent↗

PVF velocity pattern in patients with heart failure: transesophageal echocardiographic assessment.

In order to assess the role of the pulmonary venous flow (PVF) velocity pattern in the evaluation of patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), we studied 41 CHF patients by means of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The etiology of CHF was idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy in 19 patients and hypertensive heart disease in 22. Sixteen subjects without cardiovascular disease were selected as normal controls. PVF peak systolic and peak early diastolic (D) velocities were recorded by TEE and TTE and the systolic fraction (SF) was measured (i.e., the systolic velocity-time integral-VTI-expressed as a fraction of the sum of systolic and early diastolic (VTI). TEE tracings were obtained in all patients and had more laminar-appearing spectral signals, thus were used for analysis. By TEE the mitral flow velocity patterns were also evaluated: peak early diastolic velocity (E), peak velocity at atrial contraction, E velocity normalized for VTI (E/VTI), deceleration time (DT), and left ventricular isovolumic relaxation time (LVIRT). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated by two-dimensional echocardiographic images using the modified Simpson method. The SF was lower in CHF patients as compared with normal controls (p < 0.0001). The E/VTI ratio was higher, and DT and LVIRT were shorter (p < 0.0001) in CHF patients. A significant correlation was observed between SF and LVEF in CHF patients (r = 0.76, p < 0.001). Two different PVF velocity patterns (type A:SF << 50%, D > 50 cm/s; type B:SF approximately 50%, D > 50 cm/s) were recognized in patients with a low LVEF (type A) and a nearly normal or normal LVEF (type B). Patients with LVEF < 40% showed mean SF values significantly lower than patients with LVEF > 40% (33.26 +/- 10.84 vs. 51.00 +/- 4.00%, p < 0.0001). Mean DT and LVIRT values were not significantly different in patients with LVEF < 40% and > 40%. Thus in CHF patients TEE PVF velocity patterns help in distinguishing patients with systolic dysfunction (low LVEF and SF) from patients with predominant diastolic impairment (normal or nearly normal LVEF, high D velocities).

Adult↗