A testing question.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A Coulter.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between the structure of care for diabetes in general practice and the corresponding admission rates for diabetic patients to hospital. A questionnaire was sent to 350 group or single handed practices in the Oxford region and a retrospective analysis was made of admission rates using hospital activity analysis. Admission rates were adjusted for the age structure of the practices. The degree of organization of care was determined by drawing up a composite score from the answers to the questionnaire and comparing practices with few, average and many facilities. There was a significant trend in the rates of admission across the groups of practices: those with few facilities made 16.2 admissions per 10,000 population over two years, those with average facilities 13.8 admissions, and those with many facilities 14.0 admissions (chi-squared trend = 6.88, 1 df, P less than 0.01). These findings support the hypothesis that organized general practice care reduces the rate of hospital admissions, although there are many other influences on the admission rate from any one practice.
A survey of accidents in children under 16 years of age from one general practice (list size 6400) was carried out using a postal questionnaire to parents and an audit of medical records. Incidence rates were estimated by audit of medical records as 97% of accidents 'other than minor cuts and bruises' reported by parents had resulted in a medical consultation, and parental reporting was incomplete. For 1986, these rates were 254 per 1000 patients at the age of four years or less, 218 per 1000 at age five to nine years and 238 per 1000 at age 10 to 15 years. However, parental reports of accidents provided better detail of the circumstances of accidents than the medical records: in the latter, the circumstances of accidents were noted in 75% of records and the location in only 40%. Various options for monitoring accidents and near accidents utilizing parental information which could be administered by general practitioners are proposed, including the use of parent-held child health record cards and a 'yellow card' system analogous to that used for reporting adverse drug reactions.
There has been much concern about the wide variations in general practitioners' referral rates and the consequent implications for cost and quality of care. This has led to a call to evaluate the appropriateness and effectiveness of referrals. A collaborative audit of referrals to outpatient clinics was conducted by 127 general practitioners in 33 practices in the Oxford region. Records were kept of 18,754 referrals, which included data on diagnoses and reasons for referral. Overall, 6553 (35.4%) of the referrals were for particular treatments or operations and a further 6475 (34.9%) were for specific investigation or diagnosis. Advice on management was the main reason for referral in 2656 (14.3%) cases, and in 1719 (9.3%) cases the general practitioners wanted the consultants to take over managing their patients. Reassurance of either the general practitioner or the patient was recorded as the main reason in only 762 (4.1%) referrals. There seems to be scope for rationalising the referral process. A programme with three stages for evaluating referrals to outpatient clinics is recommended.
Although linkage by computer of hospital administration systems across all clinics in a health district is becoming a practical possibility, complete records of general practitioners' referrals to outpatient clinics will be difficult to achieve. Data from a large study of general practitioners' referrals to such clinics were used to calculate the proportion of referrals that crossed district boundaries, the proportion that were made to the private sector; and the number of locations that each practice referred patients to. Of the 17,601 referrals from practices in Oxford Regional Health Authority, 13,857 (78.7%) were made to NHS outpatient clinics within practices' own districts, 1524 (8.7%) to clinics in other districts in the same region, 420 (2.4%) to NHS clinics in other regions, and 1800 (10.2%) to the private sector; but these proportions varied considerably among the practices. The mean number of different NHS hospitals or clinics that each practice referred patients to was 15.8 (range 4-42).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Lists of patients receiving repeat prescriptions for epilepsy, diabetes, thyroid disease and asthma were compared with chronic disease registers stored on seven practice computers. Diabetes was the most accurately recorded disease: the names of 72% of patients receiving medication for this condition appeared on the relevant disease registers. Agreement between the two data sources was 68% for thyroid disease, 58% for asthma and 49% for epilepsy. The levels of accuracy are not yet high enough for the computerised chronic disease registers to provide an accurate estimate of the prevalence of these conditions, but new system developments suggest a more optimistic outlook for the future.
Two commonly held beliefs about referral rates were investigated in this study: first that demand for services is determined by supply and secondly that there is wide variation between general practices in their referral rates. All referrals to specialist outpatient clinics were recorded during two 11-week periods by general practitioners in eight practices in the new town of Milton Keynes and in 17 practices elsewhere in the Oxford region. During the first period, only a limited outpatient service was available in the new town; for many specialist services, people had to be referred to hospitals outside the district. Referral rates from Milton Keynes were very similar to those from the rest of the region. By the second period the range of specialist facilities available locally had expanded considerably with the opening of the new district general hospital and during this period there was a statistically significant but rather small increase in referral rates from Milton Keynes. Variation in referral rates between general practices within each geographical group was greater than that between the two groups. Overall, there was about a three-fold variation between general practices in outpatient referral rates which is considerably less than that commonly thought to exist.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Hysterectomy is performed much less frequently in Britain than in North America, Australia and some European countries. Various theories have been advanced to explain this lower rate of surgery. These include: fewer health care resources (hospital beds, surgeons); much less fee-for-service medicine; differences in the attitudes of surgeons; differences in health care organisation, in particular the gatekeeping role of general practitioners; and differences in patients' expectations. This paper reviews the evidence on sources of variation and examines the extent to which hysterectomy rates vary between countries, and between small areas and social groups within Britain. Following an examination of national trends, evidence is presented from studies carried out in the Oxford region to illustrate the extent of variation in the rate at which hysterectomy is carried out and to explore the possible reasons for the differences. The article considers the health policy implications of an apparent increase in demand for hysterectomy and argues the case for a thorough evaluation of the impact of this operation on quality of life.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.