[Shock and renal ultrastructure].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A Conforti.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Lymphatic mapping, sentinel lymphadenectomy, and selective complete lymph node dissection (LM/SL/SCLND) is an increasingly popular alternative to elective lymphadenectomy (ELND) for patients with early-stage melanoma. Although several reports have demonstrated the accuracy of the LM/SL technique, there are no data on its therapeutic value. METHODS: We performed a matched-pair statistical analysis of 534 patients with clinical stage I melanoma; one half of the patients were treated with LM/SL and the other half were treated with ELND. Patients in the two treatment groups were matched for age (54% were < or =50 years of age), gender (63% were male patients), site of the primary melanoma (49% were on the extremities, 36% on the trunk, and 15% on the head and neck), and thickness of the primary melanoma (7% were < 0.75 mm, 42% between 0.75 and 1.5 mm, 43% between 1.51 and 4.0 mm, and 8% > 4 mm). Patients in the LM/SL group underwent complete regional lymphadenectomy (SCLND) only if the LM/SL specimen contained metastatic melanoma. RESULTS: The overall incidences of nodal metastases were no different (P = .18) between LM/SL (15.7%) and ELND (12%) groups, but the incidence of occult nodal disease was significantly (P = .025) higher among patients with intermediate-thickness (1.51-4.0-mm) primary tumors who underwent LM/SL (23.7%) instead of ELND (12.2%). Survival data were compared by the log-rank score test. LM/SL/SCLND and ELND resulted in equivalent 5-year rates of disease-free survival (79 +/- 3.3% and 84 +/- 2.2%, respectively; P = .25) and overall survival (88 +/- 3.0% and 86 +/- 2.1%, respectively; P = .98). The LM/SL and ELND groups also exhibited similar incidences of same-basin recurrences (4.8% vs. 2.1%, P = .10, respectively) and in-transit metastases (2.6% vs. 3.8%, P = .48) after tumor-negative dissections. Patients who underwent ELND showed a higher incidence of distant recurrences (8.9% vs. 4.0%, P = .03), but this may be related to the longer follow-up period for these patients (median, 169 months), compared with the LM/SL-treated patients (45 months). Among patients with tumor-positive nodal dissections, the 5-year overall survival rates were higher, and approached significance (P = .077) for patients treated by LM/SL/SCLND (64 +/- 12%) compared with ELND (45 +/- 10%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that LM/SL/SCLND is therapeutically equivalent to ELND but may be more effective for identifying nodal metastases in patients with intermediate-thickness primary tumors.
Since it is known that nitric oxide plays an important protective role in maintaining the tissue integrity and is cytotoxic for invasive micro-organisms, diclofenac and a new original diclofenac-derivate, nitrofenac (containing the nitric oxide group), was administered at doses of 0.3 and 3 mg kg-1 per os to adjuvant arthritic rats. At the 14th, 21st and 28th days after arthritis induction, the antiinflammatory efficacy and the effects on intestinal microflora of the two drugs were evaluated; moreover, at the end of the study period, the gastrointestinal tract was examined macroscopically for any presence of lesions. Daily oral administration of diclofenac and nitrofenac at 3 mg kg-1 markedly and significantly inhibited arthritis development until the end of the study period. Some significant changes were observed in anaerobic and Gram-negative bacterial flora, particularly the total disappearance, in all treated rats, of Escherichia coli 1, also 7 days after the last drug administration. Finally, no ulcers or severe damage were observed macroscopically with either drug, even if some alterations in the mucosa and haemorrhagic effusions were more evident in rats treated with diclofenac at 3 mg kg-1. In conclusion, in this chronic model a similar therapeutic efficacy of diclofenac and nitrofenac is shown in arthritic rats. The better gastrointestinal tolerability observed in nitrofenac-treated rats could be attributed to the release of nitric oxide.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In the present study we investigated the correlation between the progression of adjuvant arthritis induced by Mycobacterium butyricum and the production of nitric oxide and some pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in arthritic rats and in rats treated with low intra-peritoneal doses of Mycobacterium 3 and 10 days after arthritis induction. The intra-peritoneal administration of Mycobacterium antigen significantly inhibited disease development. Compared to healthy rats, a rise in serum and peritoneal pro-inflammatory cytokines was observed in all arthritic rats already from the 14 day. The treatment with intra-peritoneal Mycobacterium was associated with a significant reduction in IL-6 serum concentrations and a slight decrease of IFN-gamma production by peritoneal macrophages. Nitrite/nitrate plasma and peritoneal levels were significantly higher in all arthritic rats. Intra-peritoneal administration of Mycobacterium caused a further increase in nitrite/nitrate plasma concentrations, while no differences were evident in nitric oxide production by peritoneal macrophages. From our data it is evident that among the variables here investigated, IL-6 seems to be the more representative marker of the disease and of the treatment effect. A possible role of nitric oxide as a modulator rather than a direct mediator in this model of inflammation is discussed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.