Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Cattan

Publications and source records attributed to A Cattan.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

CA-50 and CA-19.9 as tumour markers: which is preferable?

CA-50 (Kit IRMA Stena Diagnostic, cut-off value: 16 U/ml) and CA-19.9 (Kit SPAC Mallinckrodt were compared in a prospective study including 323 cancer patients (56% metastatic) and 120 patients with non neoplastic disease. The CA-50 and CA-19.9 sensitivities were 41.8% and 39% respectively; the CA-50 sensitivity was greater in the cancers of the gastro-intestinal (GI) tract (61.3% versus 51.6% alpha less than 0.00001) and did not differ in the other cases. The CA-19.9 specificity was greater (77.5% versus 64.2% alpha less than 0.0001), due to a greater specificity in the case of respiratory diseases (86.7% versus 66.7% alpha less than 0.0001). A good correlation was found between the serum levels of the two markers in each group of patients (cancer r = 0.78, alpha less than 0.001; benign diseases r = 0.69, alpha less than 0.001). This study has shown a close correlation between these two markers; the reliabilities of CA-50 and CA-19.9 were similar, particularly in the gastro-intestinal diseases (58.3% versus 51.3%). In conclusion, CA-50 and CA-19.9 are both good markers of cancers of the GI tract. Their simultaneous assay would be useless.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Analysis of CA-125 levels in the sera of patients with non-ovarian carcinomas and non-malignant diseases.

CA-125 is known as a marker of ovarian carcinoma; it is useful in monitoring response to treatment and it is even said to be a means of detecting ovarian carcinomas. We have studied the serum levels of CA-125 in 260 patients with advanced carcinomas (excluding ovarian cancer) and in 120 patients with non-malignant diseases (excluding gynaecological diseases). Our cut-off value was 20 IU/ml. Sensitivity was 0.53 and Specificity only 0.38; sensitivity was high in lung cancer (0.56), in breast cancer (0.46) and in cancer of the stomach (0.91). Five percent of the cancer patients had values higher than 233.5 IU/ml. Sensitivity was correlated with the presence of a metastatic disease (p less than 0.001). A second assay was obtained in 163 cases; a concordance between the variation of the serum level and the clinical evolution was found in 65% cases. A high rate of false positive values was found in cases of acute pneumonia (0.74) and of gastro-intestinal diseases (0.41). In view of these results, the optimal threshold value was set at 65 IU/ml. CA-125 appears to be a useful marker in the monitoring of advanced non-ovarian carcinomas.

Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A phase III of cisplatinum versus cisplatinum-etoposide for previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

136 patients with previously untreated stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck entered a prospective randomized trial to compare the efficacy and toxicity of DDP vs DDP-VP 16 213 (Etoposide). 69 patients (group A) were given three courses of DDP 100 mg/m2 administered on day 1, while 67 patients (group B) were given three courses of a combination of Etoposide 100 mg/m2 per os administered on days 1 to 5 and DDP 100 mg/m2 on day 4. Objective response rate appeared to be low in both groups: in group A (60 evaluated patients) CR = 1, PR = 9; CR + PR = 14.5%, and in group B (57 evaluated patients) CR = 3, PR = 8; CR + PR = 16.4% (p greater than 0.4). One drug-related death occurred in each group. There was no difference in toxicity between the two treatments with regard to leukopenia, thrombopenia, vomiting and nephrotoxicity. Thus this schedule of oral Etoposide does not seem to increase either the efficacy or the toxicity of DDP.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗