Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Barbaud

Publications and source records attributed to A Barbaud.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

A baboon syndrome induced by intravenous human immunoglobulins: report of a case and immunological analysis.

Following the second series of intravenous human immunoglobulins (IVIg; 0.4 g/kg) prescribed to treat a sensorimotor polyneuritis, a 28-year-old woman developed pompholyx that recurred after each of the following monthly treatments with IVIg. During the administration of the 10th series, the patient developed a typical baboon syndrome. Immunohistochemical studies of a skin biopsy revealed an unexpected epidermal expression of P-selectin, usually expressed by endothelial cells. Patch, prick and intradermal tests performed with IVIg on the back, arms and buttocks gave negative results on immediate and delayed readings. IVIg were re-administered, with the informed consent of the patient, and induced a generalized maculopapular rash. This is the first reported case of baboon syndrome induced by IVIg. Although extensive skin testing was performed, all test sites remained negative. We wonder whether IVIg could reproduce immunological mechanisms involved in the 3 types of systemic contact dermatitis (pompholyx, baboon syndrome and maculopapular rash), including the epidermal expression of P-selectin.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[Leg ulcers. Allergologic studies of 359 cases].

INTRODUCTION: Leg ulcers are a common disease in dermatology. Their social and economic implications are important, especially when contact dermatitis complicates these wounds. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study a total of 359 patients had contact dermatitis investigations over a period of 5 years. Patch-tests were performed on 116 men and 243 women hospitalized with venous and/or arterial leg ulcers, with or without clinical appearance of periulcerous contact dermatitis. Standard patch-tests of the ICDRG (International Contact Dermatitis Research Group) were systematically performed as well as a specific series of 40 tests. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Positive patch tests were observed in 82.5 p. 100 of the patients, indicating a very high rate of contact allergy in patients with leg ulcers. Peru balsam, lanolin and neomycin were the most frequent culprits of positive patch-tests in this population. Five percent of patch-tests with eosin were positive in our study. This is not common in the literature. Moreover, we highlight the high rate of contact sensitization to corticosteroids in this population. According to these results and to the literature, a new series of patch-tests for leg ulcers is suggested. CONCLUSION: Polysensitization in patients with chronic wounds is very frequent. A series of patch-tests in leg ulcers may lead to some interesting conclusions but a good questioning of the patient is always necessary to complete this series.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

["Buffalo hump" related to indinavir treatment].

BACKGROUND: Since 1997, new side effects like lipodystrophia have been described in HIV-1-infected patients treated with protease inhibitors. The evolution is not specified in the most reported cases. CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old man treated for HIV 1 infection developed a Buffalo hump 12 months after initiating a new treatment including indinavir-protease inhibitor (Crixivan). Ten months later, we observe neither other fat accumulation nor fat loss and significant metabolic disorders. DISCUSSION: Many publications emphasized the relationship that would exist between protease inhibitors therapy and the occurrence of lipodystrophia. Clinical features of this syndrome appear like an accumulation of fatty tissue anywhere on the trunk, or a fat loss on the limbs, the buttocks and the face. It is sometimes associated with metabolic disorders. The pathogenesis of these lipodystrophia is unclear. Larger studies have to be led to highlight the incidence of these lipodystrophia and their subsequent effects on the HIV-1 infection.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed1998

The use of skin testing in the investigation of cutaneous adverse drug reactions.

Skin testing with the suspected compound has been reported to be helpful in determining the cause of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs), but the value and specificity of these tests need to be determined. In this study, 72 patients with presumed drug eruptions (27 maculopapular, 18 urticarial, seven erythrodermic, nine eczematous, four photosensitivity, three fixed drug eruptions, three with pruritus and one with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis) were assessed. All had drug patch tests; 46 also had prick tests and 30 had intradermal tests (performed on hospitalized patients using a sterile solution of the suspected drug, diluted sequentially) with immediate and delayed readings. Among these patients, 52 (72%) had a positive skin test reaction, 43%, 24% and 67% in patch, prick and intradermal skin tests, respectively. The results of skin tests varied with the drug tested and with the clinical type of cutaneous ADR, as a significantly higher number of positive patch tests was observed in maculopapular rashes than in urticarial reactions (P = 0.001). This study supports the value of careful sequential drug skin testing in establishing the cause of cutaneous ADR. Guidelines are proposed for performing these tests, and these include the use of appropriate negative control patients to avoid false-positive results.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Mechanism of allergic contact dermatitis from propacetamol: sensitization to activated N,N-diethylglycine.

In order to confirm the mechanism of skin sensitization to propacetamol, a pro-drug of acetaminophen, 3 patients with allergic contact dermatitis from propacetamol were patch tested with N,N-diethylglycine phenyl ester, an activated form of N,N-diethylglycine. Positive patch tests were observed in all the patients at 10% in pet., while 20 control patients remained negative. This strongly suggests that propacetamol is acting as an activated form of N,N-diethylglycine, transferring this part of the molecule to nucleophilic residues of proteins. This also explains why reactions to acetaminophen have never been observed in patients sensitized to propacetamol.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed1998

[Chronic radiodermatitis after interventional cardiac catheterization. Four cases].

BACKGROUND: Fluoroscopic and cineradiographic procedures expose patients undergoing coronarography to high doses of ionizing irradiation. CASE REPORT: We report four cases of radiodermitis following cardiac catheterization. A 69-year-old man developed a radio-induced ulceration on the left scapular region in 1991 which required excision with skin graft. He had undergone 3 coronarographies and 2 angioplasties from 1989 to 1991. In 1992, a 59-year-old women developed a hard dorsal lesion with central ulceration and scar formation requiring excision and graft. From 1990 to 1992, she had undergone two coronary dilatations with angioplasty during one procedure. An atrophic necrotic wound situated under the right nipple developed in a 63 year old man. Excision with flap reconstruction was performed in 1993, two years after an unsuccessful angioplasty then two-vessel bypass. In a fourth case, a 52 year-old woman developed a telangiectasic ulceration on the right breast in 1990. The diagnosis of radio-induced dermitis was confirmed in 1996 and the patient was treated by excision. She had had three angioplasties in 1989. DISCUSSION: Four other cases of radio-induced dermatitis following cardiac catheterism have been reported in the literature since 1996. Six other cases were also recently reported in France. All of these patients had undergone coronarography with transluminal coronary angioplasty. Besides coronarography, irradiation exposure is greatest for guide and balloon insertion required for dilatation procedures. Angioplasty is particularly dangerous because the irradiation beam is focused on the stenosis while the entire coronary network is concerned for coronarography. In most cases of radio-induced dermatitis following cardiac catheterism, the diagnosis is usually evident from the clinical context and the localization of the coronary lesion. In many cases however, the long delay to onset may make diagnosis a difficult task. In addition, the radiation dose delivered to the skin during cardiac procedures is not measured.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

[Dermatitis caused by estrogens].

BACKGROUND: We report a case of sensitization to estrogen. CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old woman consulted for skin disorders which followed a cyclic pattern. At each menses, the patient developed pruritus and erythematous papulovesicular lesions over the members and trunk. Estraderm patch contact dermatitis was evident. Prick and patch tests with alcoholic solutions of estrone alone were positive. Serum tests were positive for anti-ethinyl-estradiol antibodies and anti-progesterone antibodies. DISCUSSION: Autoimmune dermatitis can be caused by sensitization to endogenous or exogenous sex hormones. Clinical manifestations and histological findings are variable and non-specific. The cyclic nature of the manifestations is however quite suggestive. Positive prick and patch tests performed with alcohol solutions of the hormones may give the diagnosis and serum tests may be positive for specific anti-steroid antibodies. These complementary explorations are however difficult to perform and interpret and definitive diagnosis is based on an association of clinical findings, skin tests, laboratory tests and the clinical course. In case of progesterone sensitization, the treatment of choice is estrogen inhibition of ovulation. For estrogen sensitization, anti-estrogen treatment appears to be more effective. Finally, bilateral ovariectomy may be required in difficult cases.

Administration, Cutaneous↗