Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A B Lawrence

Publications and source records attributed to A B Lawrence.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Naloxone prevents interruption of parturition and increases plasma oxytocin following environmental disturbance in parturient sows.

Experiments in rodents have suggested that environmental disturbance can disrupt parturition through an opioid-mediated inhibition of oxytocin secretion. To test this hypothesis in a large animal model, 14 primiparous female pigs were allowed to commence parturition in a strawed pen. Five of these gilts were allowed to continue parturition undisturbed in this pen, while the remainder were moved to a farrowing crate immediately after the birth of the first piglet. At this time, pigs were injected subcutaneously with either the opioid antagonist naloxone (n = 4; dose 1 mg/kg body weight) or saline (n = 5). Whereas the undisturbed pigs all gave birth to a second piglet within 53 min, in three of the five disturbed and saline-treated pigs no further births occurred for 2 h, at which time oxytocin was administered subcutaneously to restart parturition. By contrast, all of the naloxone-treated pigs gave birth spontaneously within 2 h, although mean interbirth intervals were still prolonged compared to undisturbed pigs. In a second experiment, nine primiparous female pigs with chronic catheters preplaced in the external jugular vein were similarly moved after the birth of their first piglet and either injected with naloxone (n = 5) or saline (n = 4). Again, parturition was interrupted in three out of four saline-treated animals for at least 2.5 h, but resumed promptly when exogenous oxytocin was administered. Plasma concentrations of oxytocin in these pigs were significantly lower than in naloxone-treated pigs, five out of six of which gave birth spontaneously to one or more piglets within 2.5 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Relationship between amphetamine and environmentally induced stereotypies in pigs.

The study investigated the relationship between the behavioural response to a standard dose of amphetamine and environmentally induced stereotypies in pigs. There were large individual differences in the frequency of amphetamine-induced stereotypies and time spent in locomotion. In addition, these two measures tended to be negatively correlated to each other, indicating that they were competitive. Levels of amphetamine stereotypies were negatively correlated with those of chain manipulation and drinking after a period of 50 and 100 days of physical restraint and food restriction; levels of locomotion were positively correlated with levels of chain manipulation after 100 days of restraint and restrictive feeding. These results suggest that pigs differ in their predisposition to develop environmentally induced stereotypies, and that this is related to catecholaminergic systems in the brain. In an amphetamine test performed after the period of restraint and restrictive feeding, amphetamine stereotypies were generally higher than in the first test but behaviour was no longer correlated to previous levels of environmentally induced stereotypies. The qualitative differences between the two forms of stereotypy, their negative rather than positive correlation, and the lack of correlation between environment-dependent stereotypies and stereotypies in the second amphetamine test suggests a complex relationship between these two forms of stereotypies. The increased amphetamine sensitivity in the second amphetamine test may reflect the effect of stress on central catecholaminergic systems.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed1992

Behavioural responses to amphetamine and apomorphine in pigs.

The effects of different doses of amphetamine (0-1.5 mg/kg) and apomorphine (0-1.0 mg/kg) on behaviour of pigs were compared. Amphetamine induced an increase in levels of nosing and rooting and of locomotion. These increases were, however, related to increased levels of standing. At higher doses (1.0-1.5 mg/kg), amphetamine specifically induced a rigid standing posture with jerking head and limb movements. Apomorphine at 0.1-1.0 mg/kg increased locomotion. In contrast to amphetamine, this effect was specific as it was not explained by increased levels of standing. At 1.0 mg/kg, apomorphine specifically induced "locomotion while the pigs maintained snout contact with the floor or trough." In addition, at this dose it induced drinking in one test, while licking in another. These differences may in part be due to differences in the test environment. Apomorphine exerted a strong conditioning effect, as indicated by the lack of behavioural variability in the postinjection period. This effect may explain the large interindividual variation in apomorphine response. Amphetamine and apomorphine elicit different behavioural syndromes in pigs, suggesting that they act on different neural systems. In addition, neither amphetamine nor apomorphine elicited behaviour that closely resembles environmentally induced stereotypies.

Amphetamine↗
PubMed1991

Relationship between agonistic behaviour and propensity to develop excessive drinking and chain manipulation in pigs.

Consistent individual differences in animals' responses to different stressful situations may indicate the involvement of a single behavioural and neurological mechanism across these situations. Two replicate groups of sixteen food restricted pigs were subjected to a group feeding competition test where group members were required to compete over a food source. All agonistic interactions were scored and ranked dominance scores were calculated. The pigs were subsequently put into two different forms of restrictive housing (restraint or loose), with half of the pigs food restricted. No housing effects were found. Only food restricted pigs developed excessive drinking and chain manipulation, but large individual differences existed. Pigs ranked high in dominance score were found to significantly increase their drinking levels over the experimental period of three months, having significantly higher drinking levels than low ranking pigs in the second and third month. No significant relationship was found between ranked dominance score and levels of chain manipulation. The present results suggest that in pigs differences in the propensity to develop forms of excessive drinking under restrictive housing and feeding conditions are related to agonistic tendencies in a group feeding competition test. These data also suggest that excessive drinking and chain manipulation are at least in part based on different behavioural and presumably neural mechanisms.

Agonistic Behavior↗
PubMed1985

Animal husbandry: the period 1973-1995.

In the last decade the intensification of the pig and poultry industries has continued with increases in production unit size and in efficiency. This has come about as a response to rising costs, competition and reasonable end-product prices. The dairy industry has also expanded output through increasing milk yield per cow, encouraged by favourable market support. However, efficiency of feed conversion to milk production is still not directly selected for in dairy cattle. Developments in beef cattle have been away from intensive systems of production in an effort to reduce capital expenditure and increases in sheep productivity have been largely through increased stocking rates, greater fertilizer use and better grazing systems. In the next decade there are many feasible technological advances awaiting application. The use of computer simulation is likely to assist in predicting quantitative and qualitative body compositional responses to nutrition and in increasing the efficiency of grass utilization, while microprocessor technology will be developed into artificial aids to the stockman. Studies of reproductive physiology will continue to help increase output, especially with pigs and sheep. The building of sophisticated housing is likely to be justified for pigs, poultry, dairy cattle and calves, but not for suckler beef and sheep. There is likely to be greater use of centralized breeding schemes for dairy cattle, beef cattle and sheep. The future application of technology will be limited by a number of socio-economic factors. For example, the use of milk quotas to control surplus production will act as a powerful economic constraint to increased milk production and the growing public concern over animal welfare, pollution and health aspects of animal produce will exert increasing pressure on certain systems of production.

Animal Feed↗