Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A A Moore

Publications and source records attributed to A A Moore.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Using data to enhance the expert panel process. Rating indications of alcohol-related problems in older adults.

OBJECTIVE: To enhance the validity of a well-known expert panel process, we used data from patient surveys to identify and correct rating errors. METHODS: We used the two-round RAND/UCLA panel method to rate indications of harmful (presence of problems), hazardous (at risk for problems), and nonhazardous (no known risks) drinking in older adults. Results from the panel provided guidelines for classifying older individuals as harmful, hazardous, or nonhazardous drinkers, using a survey. The classifications yielded unexpectedly high numbers of harmful and hazardous drinkers. We hypothesized possible misclassifications of drinking risks and used the survey data to identify indications that may have led to invalid ratings. We modified problematic indications and asked three clinician panelists to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the modifications in a third panel round. We revised the indications based on panelist response and reexamined drinking classifications. RESULTS: Using the original indications, 48% of drinkers in the sample were classified as harmful, 31% as hazardous, and 21% as nonhazardous. A review of the indications revealed framing bias in the original rating task and vague definitions of certain symptoms and conditions. The modified indications resulted in classifications of 22% harmful, 47% hazardous, and 31% nonhazardous drinkers. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of survey data led to identification and correction of specific errors occurring during the panel-rating process. The validity of the RAND/UCLA method can be enhanced using data-driven modifications.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Are older hazardous and harmful drinkers less likely to participate in health-related behaviors and practices as compared with nonhazardous drinkers?

OBJECTIVES: To describe the (1) prevalence of at-risk drinking and participation in health-related behaviors and practices and (2) associations of at-risk drinking with other health-related behaviors and practices among older persons completing a health-risk appraisal for the elderly (HRA-E). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using data from a self-administered, mailed survey sample. SETTINGS: Persons from three organizations were surveyed: (1) the American Association of Retired Persons; and (2) a large medical group and (3) a community-based senior health center in southern California. PARTICIPANTS: 1,889 persons age 55 years and older. MEASUREMENTS: The HRA-E included items on health characteristics, drinking behaviors (including amount of alcohol use and two alcoholism screening measures: the CAGE (Cut down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye opener) and Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test-Geriatric version (SMAST-G), and participation in selected health-related behaviors and practices. Social drinkers were defined as those who drank fewer than 14 drinks weekly and screened negative on the CAGE (defined as two or more "no" responses) and SMAST-G. Hazardous drinkers drank fewer than 14 drinks weekly and screened negative. Harmful drinkers drank fewer than 14 drinks weekly and screened positive. Possible at-risk drinkers drank 14 or more drinks weekly and screened positive. Least squares regression models were used to assess the effects of hazardous, harmful, and possible at-risk drinking on each of the health-related practices and behaviors. We also conducted these analyses using three other definitions of social, possible at-risk, hazardous, and harmful drinking. RESULTS: Of all respondents, 40% were social drinkers, 3% were harmful drinkers, 2% were hazardous drinkers, and 11% were possible at-risk drinkers. Hazardous, harmful, and possible at-risk drinkers commonly reported driving after drinking or being driven by someone who had been drinking (67%, 76%, and 64% respectively). Harmful and possible at-risk drinkers were more likely than social drinkers to smoke and were less likely to use seatbelts regularly. These findings were observed regardless of how the drinking groups were defined. CONCLUSION: All groups of at-risk drinkers more commonly engaged in selected adverse health-related behaviors and practices than did social drinkers.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2000

Using a criterion standard to validate the Alcohol-Related Problems Survey (ARPS): a screening measure to identify harmful and hazardous drinking in older persons.

We compared the Alcohol-Related Problems Survey (ARPS), a new screening measure targeted at harmful and hazardous drinking among older individuals, to a criterion standard (CS) among 22 persons aged 65 and older who reported consuming at least one drink of alcohol in the previous 12 months. The CS was conducted by a study physician and research assistant. It assessed risks from alcohol use, and consisted of a structured review of each subject's medical record, clinical interview, physical examination, and an interview with a collateral informant. Analyses included descriptive statistics for demographic and health characteristics, inter-rater reliability, agreement between the ARPS and the CS, reasons for disagreement, and sensitivity and specificity of the ARPS as compared to the CS. Using Landis and Koch criteria, inter-rater reliability between two physicians for 11 subjects was substantial (weighted kappa 0.79), but agreement between the ARPS and the CS was only fair (weighted kappa 0.28). Reasons for disagreement included problems with ARPS' questions and classification rules, and problems with study physicians' assessments of drinking risk. Based on these reasons for disagreement, we made revisions in the ARPS and its classification rules. Agreement between the revised ARPS and the CS improved substantially (weighted kappa 0.62). Sensitivity and specificity of the original ARPS were 80% and 50%, respectively, and both improved to 82% after revisions. The revised ARPS is sensitive and specific for identifying harmful and hazardous drinking in older persons as determined by clinicians.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

A new paradigm for alcohol use in older persons.

BACKGROUND: Current paradigms for conceptualizing alcohol-related problems typically focus on persons who are abusing or dependent on alcohol. These paradigms may not apply to older drinkers whose alcohol use, regardless of consumption-level, can cause problems because of age-related changes in physiology and interactions with increased morbidity, medication use, and functional limitations. OBJECTIVE: We convened an expert panel# to develop clinical indications of harmful, hazardous, and nonhazardous drinking in persons 65 years of age and older. RESEARCH DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Nine panelists with expertise in psychiatry, geriatrics, internal medicine, and alcohol research were provided with epidemiological data and a published explicit literature review of alcohol use in the elderly. The RAND/UCLA two-round panel method was used to develop the indications. After the second round, the authors wrote a draft statement that was circulated to the panelists whose comments were incorporated into a final document. RESULTS: Panelists agreed on 215 scenarios in which older peoples' use of alcohol either alone or in the presence of chronic medical conditions, medication use, symptoms, smoking, and functional limitations are hazardous or harmful. Panelists' ratings of risk did not differ significantly between persons aged 65 to 74 years and those aged 75 years and older. CONCLUSION: Alcohol use may be hazardous or harmful for older persons, particularly in conjunction with physical or emotional illnesses, medication use, functional limitations, smoking, and driving after drinking. When asking about alcohol use in older persons, clinicians need to be aware of these factors to assist in identifying and managing potential or actual alcohol-related problems.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

The prognostic value of sensory impairment in older persons.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationships between visual and hearing impairment and subsequent functional dependence and mortality among community-dwelling older persons. DESIGN: A Prospective, cohort study. SETTING: Community-based. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5444 men and women aged 55 to 74 years at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported and measured visual impairment, self-reported and measured hearing impairment, self-reported and measured combined sensory impairment, 10-year mortality, and dependency in activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental ADL (IADL), and Rosow-Breslau (RB) function. RESULTS: In multiply-adjusted models, adjusting for length of follow-up, socio-demographic characteristics, and chronic conditions, only measured visual impairment was predictive of mortality. Measured visual impairment was also predictive of 10-year ADL and IADL dependence; measured hearing impairment was predictive of RB dependence. Self-reported visual impairment predicted functional impairment on all scales at 10 years, although self-reported hearing impairment predicted only subsequent RB dependence. Measured combined impairment was associated with the highest risk of 10-year functional dependence. CONCLUSIONS: Sensory impairment is predictive of subsequent functional impairment in older persons.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1999

Drinking habits among older persons: findings from the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study (1982-84). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

OBJECTIVES: To describe alcohol use and its sociodemographic correlates among persons aged 65 years and older in a US probability sample. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of a national probability sample-based cohort study. SETTING: Multiple sites throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3448 persons aged 65 and older who participated in the first wave of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study (1982-84). MEASUREMENTS: We describe the alcohol use behaviors and demographic characteristics of 3448 persons aged 65 and older. Least squares regression models were used to assess associations between older persons' sociodemographic characteristics and alcohol use. RESULTS: Sixty percent of the sample reported having 12 or more drinks of alcohol in at least 1 year of their lives. Seventy-nine percent of these older drinkers were currently drinking. Twenty-five percent of all drinkers drank daily (31% men, 19% women). Using gender-specific definitions (men >2 drinks/day; women >1 drink/day), 16% of men drinking alcohol and 15% of women drinking alcohol were heavy drinkers. Younger age, male gender, and higher income were associated with greater alcohol use. CONCLUSIONS: Most older persons who ever drank alcohol in their lifetimes were currently drinking. In addition, a substantial number of older persons were drinking currently at levels that may place them at risk of adverse health consequences.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed1999

A nurse's guide to hormone replacement therapy.

Menopause is a natural event most women experience as they enter their 5th decade. As human life expectancy has lengthened, health issues concerning women in mid-life have become a major focus in holistic, preventive health care, which is heavily influenced by nurses. Controversy continues about the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy for women during their years of perimenopause and postmenopause. Evidence is compiling, however, that indicates the benefits of exogenous hormones may outweigh these concerns. As nurses, we must have a current knowledge of hormone replacement therapy to counsel our patients effectively. This article presents information to assist the nurse in meeting this goal.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Hearing loss in community-dwelling older persons: national prevalence data and identification using simple questions.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of hearing loss among community-dwelling older persons according to clinical criteria and to develop a brief self-report screening instrument to detect hearing loss. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: National probability sample of noninstitutionalized older persons. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2506 persons aged 55 to 74 who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hearing loss as defined by Ventry and Weinstein (VW) criteria and by the High Frequency Pure-Tone Average (HFPTA) scale. RESULTS: Hearing loss by VW criteria was present in 14.2% and by HFPTA criteria in 35.1% of those surveyed. The prevalence increased with advancing age and was higher among men and those with less education. A logistic regression model identified six independent factors for hearing loss by VW criteria: age > or = 70 years (adjusted odds-ratio (AOR) 2.7, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.6, 4.4), male gender (AOR 3.0, 95% CI 1.9, 4.8), < or = 12th grade education (AOR 3.8, 95% CI 1.8, 7.7), having seen a doctor for deafness or hearing loss (AOR 8.9, 95% CI 5.3, 14.9), unable to hear a whisper across a room (AOR 3.2, 95% CI 2.0, 5.1), and unable to hear a normal voice across a room (AOR 6.2, 95% CI 2.6, 14.9). A clinical scale based on the logistic model had 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity in predicting hearing loss using VW criteria and 59% sensitivity and 88% specificity in predicting hearing loss using HFPTA criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing loss, as defined by two clinical criteria, is common and can be screened for accurately using simple questions that assess sociodemographic and hearing-related characteristics.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Does estrogen prevent skin aging? Results from the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I)

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relation between noncontraceptive estrogen use and skin wrinkling, dryness, and atrophy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of a national probability sample-based cohort study. SETTING: Multiple community sites throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Postmenopausal women (n = 3875) aged 40 years and older at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Skin conditions (wrinkling, dryness, and atrophy) were ascertained using a uniform clinical examination by trained dermatology resident physicians. Self-reported use of estrogen before the baseline examination, sunlight exposure, and smoking history were obtained by standardized interview. Body mass index, a measure of weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters, was evaluated in uniform examination clothing. RESULTS: Mean (+/-SD) age of the participants was 61.6 (+/-9.0) years and mean (+/-SD) number of years since menopause was 15.6 (+/-9.4). Most were white (83.7%), the remainder being African American (15.9%) or another race (0.4%). Atrophy was present in 499 (16.2%), dry skin in 1132 (36.2%), and wrinkled skin in 880 women (28.2%). The prevalence of all 3 skin conditions was lower in African American women compared with white women. Information on hormone use was available for 3403 participants (88%). Among all women, after adjustment for age, body mass index, and sunlight exposure, estrogen use was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the likelihood of senile dry skin (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.97). The odds of wrinkling were substantially lower in estrogen users, adjusted for age, body mass index, and sun exposure (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.89) and additionally for smoking (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.01). In multivariable models, estrogen use was not associated with skin atrophy. CONCLUSION: These results strongly suggest that estrogen use prevents dry skin and skin wrinkling, thus extending the potential benefits of postmenopausal estrogen therapy to include protection against selected age- and menopause-associated dermatologic conditions.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

A randomized trial of office-based screening for common problems in older persons.

PURPOSE: To test the effectiveness of a 10-minute office-staff administered screen to evaluate malnutrition/weight loss, visual impairment, hearing loss, cognitive impairment, urinary incontinence, depression, physical limitations, and reduced leg mobility among older persons seen in office practice. This screen was coupled with clinical summaries to assist the physician in further evaluating and managing the screen-included problems. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six community-based office practices of internists and family physicians in Los Angeles were randomized to intervention or control groups. Two hundred and sixty-one patients aged > or = 70 years and seeing these physicians for a new visit or a physical examination participated in the study. At the enrollment visit intervention group patients were administered the screening measure and their physicians were given the pertinent clinical summaries. Outcome measures were detection of, and intervention for conditions screened, and health status 6 months after the intervention. RESULTS: Hearing loss was both more commonly detected (40% intervention versus 28% control) and further evaluated (29% versus 16%) by physicians in the intervention group (P < 0.05). No other differences in the frequency of problem detection or intervention were noted between groups. Six months after the intervention no differences were noted in health status between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A brief measure to screen for common conditions in older persons was associated with more frequent detection and follow-up assessment of hearing loss. Although the measure was well accepted by physicians and their staffs, it did not appear to affect detection and intervention in regard to the other screen-included conditions, or health status at 6 months.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1997

Correlates of hypoalbuminemia in community-dwelling older persons.

To identify easily ascertainable sociodemographic and health characteristics that are associated with hypoalbuminemia in community-dwelling older persons, we used data from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. This population-based stratified probability sample survey included 4728 persons aged 55-74 y. We defined hypoalbuminemia in two ways: < 35 g/L (1.2% of the sample) or < or = 38 g/L (7.9% of the sample) and used multivariate logistic models to identify independent predictors of hypoalbuminemia. Older age; receiving welfare; a condition interfering with eating; vomiting > or = 3 d/mo; previous surgery for gastrointestinal tumor; self-reported heart failure; recurring cough attacks; feeling tired or wornout; edentulous, fair, or poor condition of teeth; little or no exercise; a low-salt diet; trouble chewing meat; self-reported protein albumin, blood, or sugar in urine; and current cigarette smoking were independently associated with albuminemia (< or = 38 g/L) or progressively lower albumin concentrations < 40 g/L. Persons with 3-5 of these factors (51.5% of the sample) had an odds ratio of 2.73 (95% CI: 1.64, 4.54) and those with > or = 6 factors (9.4% of the sample) had an odds ratio of 6.44 (95% CI: 3.49, 11.86) of albuminemia < or = 38 g/L compared with those with 0-2 risk factors (39.1% of the sample). These findings suggest that several easily assessed sociodemographic, lifestyle, and disease-related factors are associated with hypoalbuminemia and might be valuable items to include on general health surveys to identify older persons who have this marker of poor health status.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Alcohol-related problems in older persons. Determinants, consequences, and screening.

Demographic trends reveal the elderly to be the fastest growing segment of the population. Physicians can therefore anticipate encountering increasing numbers of older patients with alcohol-related problems. These problems include liver disease, dementia, confusion (masquerading as dementia), peripheral neuropathy, insomnia, late-onset seizure disorder, poor nutrition, incontinence, diarrhea, myopathy, inadequate self-care, macrocytosis, depression, fractures, and adverse reactions to medications. Despite the prevalence of alcohol use in older people, their risks and problems are often unrecognized. We reviewed published literature on the determinants and consequences of alcohol-related problems in persons aged 65 years and older and the usefulness of available screening measures. Thirteen of 25 eligible studies on determinants and consequences met quality criteria and were reviewed. Nine additional studies on screening tests were also evaluated. Determinants include history of alcohol use and abuse, social isolation, and reduced mobility; consequences consist of risks of hip fracture from falls, neoplasms, and psychiatric illness. Currently accessible screening tests focus on high levels of alcoholic beverage use and abuse and dependence. They are not useful in screening for hazardous consumption that may result from relatively low levels of alcohol use alone or in combination with medications, medical illness, or preexisting diminished physical, emotional, or social function. Research is needed on the consequences of lower levels of alcohol consumption on the physical and psychosocial health of older individuals and on methods for distinguishing alcohol-related from age-related problems. Existing screening tests should be expanded or new screening methods developed in anticipation of a growing public health problem.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Screening for common problems in ambulatory elderly: clinical confirmation of a screening instrument.

PURPOSE: To develop a test that will be administered by nonphysician office staff to screen elderly persons seen in ambulatory settings for problems commonly contributing to functional disability. METHODS: We reviewed the literature to identify problems that reduce function and screening measures appropriate for use in office settings. Using this information, we developed an instrument including screening items for malnutrition/weight loss, visual impairment, hearing loss, cognitive impairment, urinary incontinence, depression, physical disability, and reduced leg mobility. This instrument was tested on 109 new patients at a university-based ambulatory geriatrics medicine clinic and validated using two standards: blinded and unblinded geriatricians' assessments. For each of the individual items on the screening instrument, we calculated sensitivity and specificity using both the blinded and unblinded geriatricians' evaluations as the reference standards, prevalence of the disorders, positive and negative predictive values, inter-rater reliability, and the direct annual costs of administering the test for an individual physician's office. RESULTS: The screen was administered in 8 to 12 minutes. Inter-rater agreement varied by item from 77% to 100%. The sensitivities of the items varied between 0.65 to 0.93 (blinded) and 0.70 to 0.95 (unblinded). Specificities ranged between 0.50 to 0.95 (blinded) and 0.64 to 0.95 (unblinded). Problem prevalences varied from 21% to 72%. Positive and negative predictive values were 0.60 to 0.91 and 0.77 to 0.96, respectively. Direct annual costs for a clinical practice include a one-time $530 fee for equipment and, depending on the screening administrator's salary, between $1 to $7 per patient screened. CONCLUSIONS: The screening instrument is relatively inexpensive and brief and easy to use in the ambulatory setting. It is good validity and reliability when compared to the assessment of a geriatrician. We are currently conducting a randomized trial to assess the effectiveness of the screen among older persons seen in community physicians' offices.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

A nurse's guide to hormone replacement therapy.

Menopause is a natural event most women experience as they enter their 5th decade. As human life expectancy has lengthened, health issues concerning women in mid-life have become a major focus in holistic, preventive health care, which is heavily influenced by nurses. Controversy continues about the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy for women during their years of perimenopause and postmenopause. Evidence is compiling, however, that indicates the benefits of exogenous hormones may outweigh these concerns. As nurses, we must have a current knowledge of hormone replacement therapy to counsel our patients effectively. This article presents information to assist the nurse in meeting this goal.

Adult↗